Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a minimalist NumPy

2007-11-06 Thread Travis E. Oliphant
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > NumPy is included in the OLPC operating system, which is very constrained in > space. Therefore, it would be nice to remove some subpackages to save a few > megabytes. For example, the system does not include any Fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Assessing the use of packages

2007-11-06 Thread Robert Kern
Pierre GM wrote: > All, > > It's evaluation time in my department (Bio. & Ag. Engng, UGA), and I'd need > to > document the impact of my Python contributions on the scientific community at > large, or more realistically on the numpy/scipy user community... > > * Is there a way to estimate how

[Numpy-discussion] Assessing the use of packages

2007-11-06 Thread Pierre GM
All, It's evaluation time in my department (Bio. & Ag. Engng, UGA), and I'd need to document the impact of my Python contributions on the scientific community at large, or more realistically on the numpy/scipy user community... * Is there a way to estimate how many people installed one particul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] boolean masks & lists

2007-11-06 Thread Travis E. Oliphant
John Hunter wrote: > A colleague of mine just asked for help with a pesky bug that turned > out to be caused by his use of a list of booleans rather than an array > of booleans as his logical indexing mask. I assume this is a feature > and not a bug, but it certainly surprised him: > > In [58]: ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] boolean masks & lists

2007-11-06 Thread Timothy Hochberg
On Nov 6, 2007 7:22 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm... > It looks as it 'mask' is being inernally converted from > [True, False, False, False, True] > to > [1, 0, 0, 0, 1] > > so your are finally getting > > x[1], x[0], x[0], x[0], x[1] That would be my guess as well. And, i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] boolean masks & lists

2007-11-06 Thread John Hunter
On Nov 6, 2007 8:22 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm... > It looks as it 'mask' is being inernally converted from > [True, False, False, False, True] > to > [1, 0, 0, 0, 1] Yep, clearly. The question is: is this the desired behavior because it leads to a "silent failure" for p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] boolean masks & lists

2007-11-06 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
Mmm... It looks as it 'mask' is being inernally converted from [True, False, False, False, True] to [1, 0, 0, 0, 1] so your are finally getting x[1], x[0], x[0], x[0], x[1] On 11/5/07, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A colleague of mine just asked for help with a pesky bug that turned

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy trunk is frozen for upcoming 1.0.4 release

2007-11-06 Thread David Cournapeau
Emanuel Woiski wrote: > yep I have no choice - those are a bunch of lab machines:) > thanks anyway > regards > woiski Can't you build it yourself ? You just have to install mingw, and compiling blas/lapack is not too difficult. cheers, David ___ Nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy trunk is frozen for upcoming 1.0.4 release

2007-11-06 Thread Emanuel Woiski
yep I have no choice - those are a bunch of lab machines:) thanks anyway regards woiski On Nov 6, 2007 9:59 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emanuel Woiski wrote: > > Thanks. I will try them later and let you know. Any chance to have > > those for 2.4 as well?:) > > If it wor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy trunk is frozen for upcoming 1.0.4 release

2007-11-06 Thread David Cournapeau
Emanuel Woiski wrote: > Thanks. I will try them later and let you know. Any chance to have > those for 2.4 as well?:) > If it works, I will be able to upgrade to matplotlib 0.90.1 Well, you will have to find someone else. Using windows is already painful enough: I don't have the motivation to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy trunk is frozen for upcoming 1.0.4 release

2007-11-06 Thread Emanuel Woiski
Thanks. I will try them later and let you know. Any chance to have those for 2.4 as well?:) If it works, I will be able to upgrade to matplotlib 0.90.1 Regards woiski On Nov 6, 2007 5:25 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emanuel Woiski wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 4, 2007 6:18 PM