Re: [Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

On 10/16/07, Julien Hillairet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/10/16, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > dot() also serves as Numpy's matrix multiply function. So it's trying > > to interpret that as a (3,N) matrix times a (3,N) matrix. > > > > See examples here: > > > > http://www.scipy.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

2007/10/16, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > dot() also serves as Numpy's matrix multiply function. So it's trying > to interpret that as a (3,N) matrix times a (3,N) matrix. > > See examples here: > > http://www.scipy.org/Numpy_Example_List_With_Doc#head-2a810f7dccd3f7c700d1076f15078ad1fe3c6d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

Julien Hillairet wrote: > Hello, > > > First of all, I'm sorry if this question had already been asked. I've > searched on the gmane archive and elsewhere on internet, but I didn't > found the answer to my question. > > As expected, the dot product of 2 'classical' vectors works fine : > > In [

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

On 10/16/07, Julien Hillairet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > First of all, I'm sorry if this question had already been asked. I've > searched on the gmane archive and elsewhere on internet, but I didn't found > the answer to my question. > > As expected, the dot product of 2 'classical

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

On 10/17/07, Julien Hillairet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > First of all, I'm sorry if this question had already been asked. I've > searched on the gmane archive and elsewhere on internet, but I didn't found > the answer to my question. > > As expected, the dot product of 2 'classical'

[Numpy-discussion] A basic question on the dot function

Hello, First of all, I'm sorry if this question had already been asked. I've searched on the gmane archive and elsewhere on internet, but I didn't found the answer to my question. As expected, the dot product of 2 'classical' vectors works fine : In [50]: a0 = numpy.array([1,2,3]) In [51]: nump

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Partially merging scons into trunk ?

David Cournapeau wrote: > Bryce Hendrix wrote: > >> I've only been following this thread on the perimeter, so I'm not sure >> if "makefile" migration has been discussed. I have a script I wrote >> about a year ago when we (Enthought) were looking at using SCons for our >> internal builds. The sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] setting the attributes of an array of object

Sebastian Haase wrote: > Hi, > there is a way of doing this. As far as I know, you have to create > your own "version of numpy arrays". E. g. try this: > class myNumpy(numpy.ndarray): > pass > > Then creating an instance as in > a = myNumpy(otherNumpyArray) > > would make `a` behave just like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] setting the attributes of an array of object

On Tuesday 16 October 2007 11:47:35 Sebastian Haase wrote: > Hi, > there is a way of doing this. As far as I know, you have to create > your own "version of numpy arrays". E. g. try this: ... > Be carefull that some (many / most ?) operations on that array will > return you a normal numpy array aga

Re: [Numpy-discussion] setting the attributes of an array of object

Hi, there is a way of doing this. As far as I know, you have to create your own "version of numpy arrays". E. g. try this: class myNumpy(numpy.ndarray): pass Then creating an instance as in a = myNumpy(otherNumpyArray) would make `a` behave just like any other array, except that you CAN atta

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for advice: project to get NumPy working in IronPython

We've created a Google Group to discuss this project, and if anyone's interested in contributing or advising, you're very welcome to sign up: My replies to everyone's comments below: David Cournapeau wrote: > Giles, maybe you could

[Numpy-discussion] Avoiding distributing config.h in numpy.core ?

Hi, I spent the last WE trying to understand the whole numpy build process (all this related to my project of "sconsification" of numpy). One thing which I came across, and is a bit problematic is the fact that numpy/core build process relies on a config.h which is meant to be distributed (