>> This should return an error and not silently truncate to int.
>
>Why do you say that?
I see now this was a Friday afternoon lack of imagination :)
The current behaviour is consistent and well
>defined:
>
>On a somewhat related note, you may also be interested in the PEP at
>
>http://docs.
Hi,
I'm wondering whether i can re-write the following idiom with numpy arrays:
for i in some_list:
i.some_attr = some_value
it would be wonderful if one was able to write this idiom as
arr[just_these].some_attr = some_value
or
setattr(arr[just_these], 'some_attr', some_value)
since often e
