Christopher Barker wrote:
> Yes, the docs could be clearer (and thanks Ann, that's better), but I'm
> not sure that's the core problem
>
>> +If x and y are not given, condition.nonzero() is returned. This has
>> +the effect of returning a tuple suitable for fancy indexing.
>
> Why i
Hi All,
While doing documentation, I've run into the need for a simple word to
express the fact that a variable can be an array, or anything that can be
converted to an array using asarray(). I have been using array_like for this
kind of variable, but I am open to suggestions.
Also, the current v
Yes, the docs could be clearer (and thanks Ann, that's better), but I'm
not sure that's the core problem
> +If x and y are not given, condition.nonzero() is returned. This has
> +the effect of returning a tuple suitable for fancy indexing.
Why is this a special case of where? This j
On 12/09/2007, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sentence applies to the 3-argument form, which has nothing to do with
> nonzero() and does not yield a tuple. But in general, yes, the docstring
> leaves
> much to be desired.
Well, here's what I hope is a step in the right direction.
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
>
>> nd to copy hundres of MB around unnecessarily.
>>
>> I think it is a real shame that boost currently doesn't properly support
>> numpy out of the box, although numpy has long obsoleted both numarray and
>> Numeric (which is both buggy and completely unsupported). Al
Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of times I've been confused by numpy.where(), and I think
> part of it comes from the docstring. Searching my gmail archive seems
> to indicate I'm not the only one bitten by this.
>
> Compare:
>
> In [14]: pdoc numpy.where
> Class Docstring:
> w
Hi all,
A couple of times I've been confused by numpy.where(), and I think
part of it comes from the docstring. Searching my gmail archive seems
to indicate I'm not the only one bitten by this.
Compare:
In [14]: pdoc numpy.where
Class Docstring:
where(condition, | x, y)
The result is s
I believe I have contacted them before at this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trevor Law
UC Irvine Undergraduate Student
On 9/12/07, Mathew Yeates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody know how to contact the pycdf author? His name is Gosselin I
> think. There are hardcoded values that cause pycdf to
>
> less than what? std:valarray, etc. all help with this.
I do not agree with this statement. A correct memory managed array would
increment and decrement a reference counter somewhere.
Yes, it sure would be nice to build it on an existing code base, and
> boost::multiarray seems to fit.
T
Anybody know how to contact the pycdf author? His name is Gosselin I
think. There are hardcoded values that cause pycdf to segfault when
using large strings.
Mathew
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.or
Greetings,
Just a reminder for those in the area...
http://pycamp.python.org/Texas/HomePage
The Unconference is to be held this weekend (Saturday and Sunday,
September 15, 16) at the Texas Learning & Computing Center at the
University of Houston main campus.
It's free. Sign up by adding yo
David Cournapeau wrote:
> Maybe I am naive, but I think a worthy goal would be a minimal C++
> library which wraps ndarray, without thinking about SWIG, boost and co
> first.
That's exactly what I had in mind. If you have something that works well
with ndarray -- then SWIG et al. can work with
Er.. obviousl, when i wrote : "scan the similarity algorithm and find all
the diagonals", I meant scan the "similarity matrix and find all the
diagonals".
"Similarity matrix" should really be called "Equality matrix", as I imagine
it as a matrix with dimensions len(a) x len(b) where M[x][y] = (a[x
Hi to all!
For reverse engineering purposes, I need to find where every possible chunk
of bytes in file A is contained in file B. Obviously, if a chunk of length n
is contained in B, I dont' want my script to recognize also all the
subchunks of size < n contained in the chunk.
I coded a naive impl
Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander Schmolck wrote:
>> I just saw a closely related question posted one
>> week ago here (albeit mostly from a swig context).
>
> SWIG, Boost, whatever, the issues are similar. I guess what I'd love to
> find is an array implementation that
Christopher Barker wrote:
> Alexander Schmolck wrote:
>> I just saw a closely related question posted one
>> week ago here (albeit mostly from a swig context).
>
> SWIG, Boost, whatever, the issues are similar. I guess what I'd love to
> find is an array implementation that plays well with modern
16 matches
Mail list logo
