Hello,
I noticed that there are a few places where Scipy Core is still referenced:
1). On http://numpy.scipy.org/new_features.html the title is still
Scipy Core even though the heading has been updated:
"
New Features of SciPy Core
New Features of NumPy"
2). If you do a search for "scipy"
On Mon, May 21, 2007 8:32 pm, Robert Kern wrote:
> Pearu Peterson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that numpy revision 3794 introduces `set`
>> but that is available starting from Python 2.4.
>
> Note that the code David added is compatible with Python 2.3.
>
> 22 try:
> 23 set
> 24 excep
Pearu Peterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that numpy revision 3794 introduces `set`
> but that is available starting from Python 2.4.
Note that the code David added is compatible with Python 2.3.
22try:
23set
24except NameError:
25from sets import Set as set
--
I would have to say that I agree with Robert. We (STScI) are about to
force all of our users to install numpy. For some of them that can be a
lot to ask. I don't also want to add the extra complication of
upgrading their Python version as well.
My feeling is that not everyone has made the ju
Nadav Horesh wrote:
> The question should be: Are there members who rely on python 2.3
Numeric and numpy's user base has always been much more extensive than the list
membership. I don't think that the question can be reformulated that way.
I think we still do need to support Python 2.3. Being ab
On 5/21/07, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/21/07, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nils Wagner wrote:
> > Robert Cimrman wrote:
> >> I have come to a case where using a matrix would be easier than an
> >> array. The code uses lots of dot products, so I tested s
On 5/21/07, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nils Wagner wrote:
> Robert Cimrman wrote:
>> I have come to a case where using a matrix would be easier than an
>> array. The code uses lots of dot products, so I tested scipy.dot()
>> performance with the code below and found that the arr
The question should be: Are there members who rely on python 2.3
Nadav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pearu Peterson
Sent: Mon 21-May-07 16:35
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Cc:
Subject:[Numpy-discussion] Do we still need support for Py
Hi,
I noticed that numpy revision 3794 introduces `set`
but that is available starting from Python 2.4.
Hence the question.
Best regards,
Pearu
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy
Nils Wagner wrote:
> Robert Cimrman wrote:
>> I have come to a case where using a matrix would be easier than an
>> array. The code uses lots of dot products, so I tested scipy.dot()
>> performance with the code below and found that the array version is much
>> faster (about 3 times for the given s
Robert Cimrman wrote:
> I have come to a case where using a matrix would be easier than an
> array. The code uses lots of dot products, so I tested scipy.dot()
> performance with the code below and found that the array version is much
> faster (about 3 times for the given shape). What is the reason
I have come to a case where using a matrix would be easier than an
array. The code uses lots of dot products, so I tested scipy.dot()
performance with the code below and found that the array version is much
faster (about 3 times for the given shape). What is the reason for this?
Or is something wro
12 matches
Mail list logo
