David Cournapeau wrote:
> Sturla Molden wrote:
>>
>> g77 is a Fortran 77 compiler. The development of g77 is halted.
>>
>> gfortran is a Fortran 77, 90, and 95 compiler. It is the current Fortran
>> compiler in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
>>
>>
>> You can compile the reference implementation
Sturla Molden wrote:
>
>
> g77 is a Fortran 77 compiler. The development of g77 is halted.
>
> gfortran is a Fortran 77, 90, and 95 compiler. It is the current Fortran
> compiler in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
>
>
> You can compile the reference implementation of BLAS and LAPACK with both
>
Hi,
On 2/25/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose these things could be addressed quite neatly by IPython.
> It could even modify your history similarly to what it currently
> does with the %magic commands, so that when you type
Feel free to play with implementing this, it
Thanks for all the useful comments. Some feedback about the improved version of
my code snippet. For a 40x40 matrix and d=1 the new version is 44 times faster,
and for d=2 it's 27 times faster. For my astronomical images (typical
2000x2000)
the new version saves my day.
# improved version
d = 1
N
"Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. I wasn't coming at so much from the goal of making Pylab
> a Matlab clone (as you point out, that's silly, and misses much of the
> advantage of Python), but rather from the goal of making interactive
> use as efficient as possible. When I f
> Robert Kern wrote:
> But now, I think I misunderstand some things : I thought that g77 was
> the 3.* version of the fortran compiler, and gfortran the 4.* one. But
> it looks like they are also different in the fortran dialect they are
> supporting (I know nothing about fortran). So should I use
