Matt,
Yes, I agree. I wasn't coming at so much from the goal of making Pylab
a Matlab clone (as you point out, that's silly, and misses much of the
advantage of Python), but rather from the goal of making interactive
use as efficient as possible. When I fire up ipython -pylab to do some
quick expl
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:10:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I have never used matlab, but a lot of my colleagues do. Can anyone give me
> some good references that I could show them to explain the advantages of
> python over matlab?
http://www.scipy.org/NumPyProConPage
http://thread.gmane.org/
I have never used matlab, but a lot of my colleagues do. Can anyone give me
some good references that I could show them to explain the advantages of
python over matlab?
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.o
Hi,
> import plab
>
> plab.plot() #etc.
>
> and interactive use could do from plab import *.
Yes... It's a hard call of course. I am a long term matlab user, and
switched to python relatively recently. I do see the attraction of
persuading people that you can get something very similar to matl
Hi there,
I am developing a building tool to automatically build the whole
numpy/scipy/matplotlib set from sources including dependencies, and one
of the problem I got is to force which blas/lapack version to use when
building numpy and scipy.
I thought that doing a BLAS=blaslib LAPA
