Keith Goodman wrote:
> Bool matrices and arrays don't line up when you display them because
> False has 5 letters and True has 4.
>
> After several columns it can become impossible to tell which column an
> element belongs to.
>
> Could the repr of bool matrices print 'True ' instead of 'True'?
>
Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I'm always confused about how to distribute something like SciPy for the
> MAC. What exactly should be distributed? Is it possible to use
> distutils to get it done?
To get a package format that is actually useful (bdist_dumb just doesn't cut it
on any platform, real
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Robert Kern schrieb:
>
>> Pierre GM wrote:
>>
> So, to put it "pointedly" (if that's the right word...?):
> Numpy should not get small functions from scipy -> because the size of
> scipy doesn't matter -> because scipy's modules will be installable as
> add-ons separ
Christopher Barker wrote:
> It can be a pain to build this kind of thing on OS-X, as Apple has not
> supported a Fortran compiler yet, but it can (and has) been done. IN
> fact, the Mac is a great target for pre-built binaries as there is only
> a small variety of hardware to support, and Apple
> Alan G Isaac wrote:
>> Strip it down like you suggest and aside from Windows
>> users (and Macs are increasingly popular among my
>> students) you'll have only the few that are not
>> intimidated by building SciPy (which still has no
>> intaller for Python 2.5).
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Robert
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> PS A question: is it a good thing if more students start
> using NumPy *now*? It looks to me like building community
> size is an important current goal for NumPy. Strip it down
> like you suggest and aside from Windows users (and Macs are
> increasingly popular among m
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> So, to put it "pointedly" (if that's the right word...?):
> Numpy should not get small functions from scipy -> because the size of
> scipy doesn't matter -> because scipy's modules will be installable as
> add-ons separately (and because there will be ready-to-use installers
Charles R Harris wrote:
> I've been thinking about that a bit. One solution is to have a small
> python program that takes all the pieces and writes one big build file,
> I think something like that happens now. Another might be to use
> includes in a base file; there is nothing sacred about no
Bool matrices and arrays don't line up when you display them because
False has 5 letters and True has 4.
After several columns it can become impossible to tell which column an
element belongs to.
Could the repr of bool matrices print 'True ' instead of 'True'?
Some truths are more true than othe
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> So, to put it "pointedly" (if that's the right word...?):
> Numpy should not get small functions from scipy -> because the size of
> scipy doesn't matter -> because scipy's modules will be installable as
> add-ons separately (and because there will be ready-to-use installers
Tim Hochberg (el 2006-12-20 a les 14:29:57 -0700) va dir::
> Let's look at simpler than where, which is a confusing function. How
> about *sin*.
> [...]
Ok, I think I already get the idea about the need of adding extra
opcodes if ``where()`` only accepted booleans as first arguments.
Thanks for
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:47:33AM +0100, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Please don't feel offended, I just want to make the point (as usual)
> that this way numpy is going to be a good library for other software
> projects, but not super-attractive for direct users (aka "matlab
> converts", although I pe
Robert Kern schrieb:
> Pierre GM wrote:
>> Talking about that, what happened to these projects of modular installation
>> of scipy ? Robert promised us last month to explain what went wrong with his
>> approach, but never had the time...
>
> I created a module (scipy_subpackages.py, IIRC) next
13 matches
Mail list logo
