> On 11. Aug 2018, at 00:24, Foad Sojoodi Farimani
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My first email here, so sorry in advance if I'm violating any rules.
> I'm trying to implement the convolution of NumPy arrays of arbitrary
> dimension in order to get Cauchy product of multivariate power serie
I’m +0 on removing it, so mostly neutral, but slightly in favour. While I see
the argument for having it, I also see it as a violation of DRY... The
information is already available in relevant arguments.
I doubt any people implementing this protocol are going to be lazy enough not
to implement
Hi everyone,
> On 23. Aug 2018, at 17:35, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:57 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> I mean, the idea of the envvar is to be a temporary measure enable
>> devs to experiment with a provisional feature, while being awkward
>> enough that people don't buil
> I’m On 25. Aug 2018, at 00:13, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:36 AM Hameer Abbasi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:38 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:02 AM, wro
Hi Sebastian, all,
I’d lean towards an error too, given that the invariants implied by the Python
implementation clearly aren‘t met. No strong opinions though.
Best regards,
Hameer Abbasi
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 30.11.2022 um 18:36 schrieb Sebastian Berg :
>
> Hi all,
>
> there is a
