On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:56 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 08:42 +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
>
> > > >
> > >
> > > This sounds like a restructuring or factorization of the API, in
> > > order to make it smaller,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:42 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR:
>
> Value based promotion seems complex both for users and ufunc-
> dispatching/promotion logic. Is there any way we can move forward here,
> and if we do, could we just risk some possible (maybe not-existing)
> corner cas
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:37 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> My intuition is that what users actually want is for *native Python
> types* to be treated as having 'underspecified' dtypes, e.g. int is
> happy to coerce to int8/int32/int64/whatever, float is happy to coerce
> to float32/float64/whateve
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/12801, Tyler has been trying to
> use the new `where` argument for reductions to implement `nansum`, etc.,
> using simplifications that boil down to `np.sum(
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:59 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we had discussed trying a new strategy to gather release notes on the
> last community call, but not followed up on it on the list yet.
>
> For the next release, we decided to try a strategy of using a wiki page
> to gather relea
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:02 AM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:10:16 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote:
> > In a way, I brought it up mostly as a concrete example of an internal
> > implementation which we cannot change to an objectively cleaner one
> because
> > other packag
en. However, it's only because of
the use of (as)array - if it were asanyarray that would already scupper the
plan.
Cheers,
Ralf
>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Marten
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:32 PM Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>
ay_function__ is still the best way to do this (that's the
only actual override, so most robust and performant likely), so I don't see
any reason for a deprecation.
Cheers,
Ralf
> All the best,
>
> Marten
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Ralf Gommers
&g
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:07 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:46 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>> But how about `np.sum` itself? Right now, it is overridden by
>>> __array_function__ but classes without __array_function__ support ca
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 9:43 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
>
>>> I guess the one immediate question is whether `np.sum` and the like
>>> should be overridden by `__array_function__` at all, given that what should
>>> be the future recommended override alre
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:21 AM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Thanks both for the reply and sharing the link. I recognize much (from
> both sides!).
>
>
>
>>
>> More importantly, I think we should not even consider *discussing*
>> removing` __array_functio
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:17 PM Kirill Balunov
wrote:
>
> вт, 25 июн. 2019 г. в 21:20, Cameron Blocker :
>
>> It seems to me that the general consensus is that we shouldn't be
>> changing .T to do what we've termed matrix transpose or conjugate
>> transpose.
>>
>
> Reading through this thread, I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:02 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For the names, my suggestion of lower-casing the M in the initial one,
> i.e., `.mT` and `.mH`, so far seemed most supported (and I think we should
> discuss *assuming* those would eventually involve not c
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 3:56 AM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:31 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:02 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
>> m.h.vankerkw..
gt;> > 4- transpose of 3+D arrays
>> > I think we missed the bus on this one for changing the default
>> behavior now and there are glimpses of confirmation of this above in the
>> previous mails. I would suggest discussing this separately.
>> >
>> > S
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:04 PM Kirill Balunov
wrote:
> Only concerns #4 from Ilhan's list.
>
> ср, 26 июн. 2019 г. в 00:01, Ralf Gommers :
>
>>
>> []
>>
>> Perhaps not full consensus between the many people with different
>> opinions and inter
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:24 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The main motivation for the @ PEP was actually to be able to get rid of
>> objects like np.matrix and scipy.sparse matrices that redefine the meaning
>> of the * operator. Quote: "This PEP proposes the min
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:24 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> I realize you feel strongly that this whole thread is rehashing history,
>
The .H part was. But Cameron volunteered to work on a solution that
satisfies all concerns.
but I think it is worth p
om memory.
Cheers,
Ralf
> But I guess this part should be rehashed clearer until next time :)
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:03 AM Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:18 PM Ralf
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:08 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> Hi Chuck, and thanks for putting this together!
>
> It seems the release has broken existing uses of dask array with `np.min`
> (I presume among other functions):
>
> https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/5031
>
> Perhaps `__array_function
Hi all,
PyPI now has taken 2FA (two-factor authentication) in production, which is
a useful security measure I think. Also, Tidelift is able to measure which
accounts have 2FA enabled.
I had a look at our PyPI account, and there were many owners of it. This
isn't great from a security perspective
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:37 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, at 2:34 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> This issue is not very surprising - __array_function__ is going to have a
> fair bit of backwards compat impact for people who were relying on feeding
> al
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
> This is addressed in the NEP, see bullet 1 under "Partial implementation
> of NumPy's API":
>
> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html#partial-implementati
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:38 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
&g
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:18 PM Matti Picus wrote:
> In PR 13886 I reworked the way the link to the release notes is
> generated. The current page is
>
>
> http://www.numpy.org/devdocs/release.html
>
>
> and the new page is
>
>
>
> https://8001-908607-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/home/circleci/repo/
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:15 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:38 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
&g
we were discussing in this thread.
Cheers,
Ralf
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:06 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:56 PM Sebastian Berg
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 08:42 +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>&g
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:58 AM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:44 AM Kevin Sheppard
> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to make a subclass that never propagates so that when
>> interacted with another ndarray, or even itself so that the return type is
>> always ndarray. Is this p
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 4:23 AM Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> > The one thing I worry about is maintenance burden, where numpydoc is
> already
> > spread a little bit thin -- would any of the Pandas developers be
> willing to
> > maintain it?
>
> Any reason that this is
Hi all,
I just opened https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14032, which contains a
NEP for a redesign of the NumPy website (just the top-level site, not the
docs). The part that most warrants discussion is probably the translation
part. Additions to the NEP from anyone who has useful experiences wi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:57 AM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 07:06 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > Hi Dashamir,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:49 PM Dashamir Hoxha
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > With respect to this call for contributions:
> > > https://github.com/numpy/
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:23 AM Dashamir Hoxha
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:48 AM Dashamir Hoxha
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With respect to this call for contributions:
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/13988/files
>> I would like to help with improving the website of numpy (and maybe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 7:29 AM Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:11 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Has anybody tried Katacoda before:
>>> https://www.katacoda.com/courses/python/playground ?
>>>
>>
>> I haven&
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:43 AM Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:00 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just opened https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14032, which contains
>> a NEP for a redesign of the NumPy website (just the t
Hi GSoD applicants,
To start with, I want to thank all of you who applied! There's a lot of
interest in helping improve NumPy's documentation and web presence, which
is awesome to see. During the application phase, we have interacted with
some of you already, and I will reach out to others over th
Hi all,
For the GitHub "community health" files like CoC, CONTRIBUTING, FUNDING,
SECURITY, etc., there's now the option to put them in a .github repository
so they show up for all other repos in the organization. See
https://help.github.com/en/articles/creating-a-default-community-health-file-for-
to an interesting and productive fall working
with several of you. Stay tuned!
Cheers,
Ralf
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:12 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi GSoD applicants,
>
> To start with, I want to thank all of you who applied! There's a lot of
> interest in helping improve NumPy&#
Hi Peter, thanks for writing that up!
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:07 AM Peter Andreas Entschev
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a new proposal for the implementation of NumPy array duck
> typing [1] [2], following the high-level overview described in NEP-22
> [3].
>
A couple of high level comments:
Havi
Hi all,
I propose to accept NEP 28 (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14032).
Discussion seems to have died down, and there have been no major objections
raised.
In addition to the discussion on the PR, we had some discussion on
translations in the community call 1.5 weeks ago. We decided that
Hi all,
I was trying to create a Slack workspace named numpy, but it turns out that
numpy.slack.com already exists. Does anyone have access to it or knows who
is administering it?
Thanks,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.or
- login with GitHub
> - Zulipchat is itself FOSS (I have successfully set up my own instance
> before)
> - (upcoming) public archive (read without login)
>
> Juan.
>
> On 6 Aug 2019, at 7:38 pm, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 10:24:28PM -0700, Ralf Gomme
Hi all,
Google has announced the Season of Docs participants for this year [1]. We
had a lot of excellent candidates and had to make some hard choices. We
applied for extra slots, but unfortunately didn't win the lottery for
those; we got one slot for NumPy and one for SciPy. We chose the projects
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:18 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:48 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>
>> The NEP currently does not say who this is meant for. Would you expect
>> libraries like SciPy to adopt it for example?
>>
>> The NEP also (unde
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Google has announced the Season of Docs participants for this year [1]. We
> had a lot of excellent candidates and had to make some hard choices. We
> applied for extra slots, but unfortunately didn't win the
Hopefully that would be good context for early review of
> a couple of the projects.
>
Awesome, thanks Bennet!
> I will add my name to the poll, if that's OK?
>
Yes definitely!
Cheers,
Ralf
> -- bennet
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:03 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
&g
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 6:24 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> Our Release Note page https://numpy.org/devdocs/release.html is one long
> litany of all the releases ever. While this is convenient for searching
> with CTRL-F, it is not conducive to browsing. I suggested splitting it into
> pages with a TOC p
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:03 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
> I will send out a poll to find a good time for everyone for a kickoff
>> call. Our intent is to build a documentation team with multiple writers and
>>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:10 PM Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <
arj.pyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings, what is the numpy twitter handle? Thanks!
>
There is no such thing. We're typically pretty busy with code/website/docs.
A blog, Twitter, or other social media presence has not really been on our
r
nd website, and looking
forward to the next couple of months!
Cheers,
Ralf
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:03 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Google has announced the Season of Docs participants for this y
Hi all,
On 2-3 November the NumFOCUS Summit will be held in NYC, and as a sponsored
project NumPy can send two people to it (with NumFOCUS covering travel and
hotel costs). To choose those two people we asked the members of the
Steering Council first. It seems that we may have an open slot left, s
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:28 AM Jakub Piotr Cłapa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I spent some time trying to cross-compile NumPy for Linux ARM64 on a
> macOS host as part of an OpenWRT compilation [1]. It was not so bad but
> certainly not trivial and I was wondering if we could use my experience
> to help str
Hi all,
Anne has written a very nice blog post about the start of the Season of
Docs projects:
https://towardsdatascience.com/what-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-numpy-docs-de73efb80375
It even includes a pineapple with sunglasses and a party hat, so a good
read:)
Cheers,
Ralf
___
Hi all,
At https://github.com/numpy/numpy.org/issues/37 we have an update to the
NumPy logo, changing the colors for more contrast / a more modern look.
Please have a look!
What would also be helpful is to know who made this logo, and with what
tool. We'd like to produce a new SVG, but doing that
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 8:38 AM Todd wrote:
> I think having some function for common cases like moving average and
> spectrogram would be good. Having a jumping-off point and simple reference
> for testing against could encourage someone to make a faster implementation
> down the road.
>
This
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:42 PM Inessa Pawson wrote:
> You know that NumPy is essential to the Python community. The NumPy team
> wants you to know that YOU, our user and developer community, are essential
> to us. That’s why we are putting together a team to create the inaugural
> NumPy Communit
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:09 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:15 AM Hameer Abbasi
> wrote:
> > Me, Ralf Gommers and Peter Bell (both cc’d) have come up with a proposal
> on how to solve the array creation and duck array problems. The solution is
>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:32 AM Hameer Abbasi
wrote:
> That's a lot of very good questions! Let me see if I can answer them
> one-by-one.
>
> On 06.09.19 09:49, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> But even that could be accomplished by just
> putting something in the docs. And adding the alias has substant
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:53 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:21 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:09 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:04 AM Hameer Abbasi
> wrote:
> > The fact that we're having t
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:32 AM Hameer Abbasi
wrote:
> That's a lot of very good questions! Let me see if I can answer them
> one-by-one.
>
> On 06.09.19 09:49, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> But those are general questions about unumpy, and I'm guessing no-one
> knows all the answers yet... and these
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:16 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:44 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:32 AM Hameer Abbasi
> wrote:
> >>
> >> That's a lot of very good questions! Let me see
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 4:51 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > There may be another very concrete one (that's not yet in the NEP):
> allowing other libraries that consume ndarrays to use overrides. An example
> is nu
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 14:45 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
>
>
> > > That's part of it. The concrete problems it's solving are
> > > threefold:
> > > Array creation functi
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 2:18 PM sebastian wrote:
> On 2019-09-07 15:33, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sebastian Berg
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 14:45 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 4:16 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:04 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Vendoring means "include the code". So no dependency on an external
> package. If we don't vendor, it's going to be either unused, or end up as
Hi all,
There are several open issues about people not being able to compile the
latest release with Python 3.8 betas due to our release containing
generated C code with a too old version of Cython. This happened for Python
3.7 as well. With the Python packaging system having improved that build
d
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 12:54 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:53 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:53 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:04 AM Hameer Abbasi
> wrote:
> >> > The fact that
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 2:27 PM Chun-Wei Yuan wrote:
> *The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) *has an
> outstanding opportunity for a full-time *Principal Software Engineer *on
> our Forecasting/Future Health Scenarios (FHS) team*.* The development arm
> of the team is responsible
for not updating that page, thanks for pointing
that out. That bit of text stems from a time when it was still quite
unusual to be able to use NumPy et al. in a job. Luckily these days that's
different;)
Cheers,
Ralf
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:19 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>&
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:27 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:40 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 12:54 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:53 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrot
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:53 AM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 17:28 +0200, Hameer Abbasi wrote:
> > On 07.09.19 22:06, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > Now for the end-users choosing one array-like over another, seems
> > > nicer
> > > as an implicit mechanism (why should I not
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:59 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 6:06 AM Hameer Abbasi
> wrote:
>
>> On 10.09.19 05:32, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 6:27 PM Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we've c
Hi all,
We have had community calls for quite a while, the minutes of which are
kept in https://github.com/BIDS-numpy/docs. That's quite hard to discover,
it would be better if those lived under the NumPy GitHub org. Also, we have
minutes from Season of Docs and website redesign calls, plus occasi
ke__, I
> >> would also update the NEP to reflect that changes. FWIW, I
> >> particularly neither like nor dislike __numpy_like__, but I don't have
> >> any better suggestions than that or keeping the current naming.
> >>
> >> Best,
> &
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:35 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> to try and make some progress towards a decision since the broad design
> is pretty much settling from my side. I am thinking about making a
> meeting, and suggest Monday at 11am Pacific Time (I am open to other
>
he requests for new (exotic)
> distributions to be included in Generator.
>
> Most of the generator functions follow a pattern random_DISTRIBUTION.
> Some have a bit more name mangling which can easily be cleaned up (like
> ranomd_gauss_zig, which should become PREFIX_standard_normal).
>
&g
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard <
>> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are some users of the NumPy C c
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:04 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM Robert Kern
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ralf Gommers
>>> wr
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:09 AM Robert Kern wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:09 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Robert Kern
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We might end up with more than 2 implem
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:31 PM Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:33 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:09 AM Robert Kern
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:09 AM Ralf G
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Inessa Pawson wrote:
> The NumPy web team has begun redesigning https://numpy.org determined to
> transform the website into a welcoming and useful digital hub of all things
> NumPy. We are inviting all members of our large and diverse community to
> submit their u
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:40 PM Tom Augspurger
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:10 PM Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 21:35 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
>> > On 19/9/19 2:34 am, Sebastian Berg wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > to try and make some progress towards a decis
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:09 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks to the work of Matti Pincus and Matthew Brett, manylinux1 numpy
> wheels are now available for testing.
>
Thanks so much for working on that Matti, Matthew and Chuck!
Any pointer on where the wheels are hosted? Don't se
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:00 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> Hi all, and thank you for all your hard work with this.
>
> I wanted to provide more of an "end user" perspective than I think has
> been present in this discussion so far. Over the past month, I've quickly
> skimmed some emails on this
Hi everyone,
Maja, our technical writer for Season of Docs for SciPy, created a survey
specifically about how users use the SciPy docs and what they would like to
see improved. She sent out the link to scipy-dev before and it was shared
on Twitter. We've received some really valuable responses, an
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an NEP for the 1.18
> release like Python does PEPs. If that is considered too procedural for
> releases that come out every six months or so, are there any suggestions
> f
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 7:14 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:58 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>&
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:22 AM Inessa Pawson wrote:
> I’m working on creating a curated collection of NumPy related educational
> resources (tutorials, articles, books, presentations, courses, etc.).
> Your recommendations would be much appreciated, especially in languages
> other than English.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:18 AM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:02 PM Stefan van der Walt
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, at 09:34, Charles R Harris wrote:
>>
>> I think we can support 3.5 as long as we please, the question is how long
>> we *want* to support it. I do
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:36 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:06 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:18 AM Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>&g
Hi all,
In https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14734 we're working on a NEP
template update, with the goal of better separating content that's relevant
for users and authors of packages that depend on NumPy from implementation
details. Please have a look and comment on the PR if you're interested
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:22 AM Inessa Pawson wrote:
> We are looking for code snippets that illustrate NumPy’s unique
> capabilities.
>
Maybe good to clarify a bit: we are looking for a short snippet to put at
the top of the main page of the new website. Say 3-10 lines of code. It
should illust
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:54 PM PIERRE AUGIER <
pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
> Dear Python-Numpy community,
>
> Transonic is a pure Python package to easily accelerate modern
> Python-Numpy code with different accelerators (currently Cython, Pythran
> and Numba).
>
> I'm trying to g
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM PIERRE AUGIER <
pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:49:08 -0500
> > From: Ralf Gommers
> > To: Discussion of Numerical Python
> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Transonic Vision
Hi all,
I'm very pleased to announce that NumPy and OpenBLAS have received a joint
grant for $195,000 from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
In summary, this grant is for high-level documentation, website development
and graphic design, governance activities and community building for NumPy,
and fo
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:27 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:41 AM Matti Picus
> wrote:
>
> Apple has dropped support for Accelerate. It has bugs that have not
> been
> fixed, and is closed source so we cannot fix them ourselves. We have
> been getting a ha
Hi all,
Please welcome Shaloo Shalini to the NumPy team. Shaloo is an
experienced technology
marketing consultant with a passion for open source. She has been
contributing graphical content, information mapping and technical writing
since the summer. Most of that still needs to be integrated into
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:35 PM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, at 15:42, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> I'm very pleased to announce that NumPy and OpenBLAS have received a joint
> grant for $195,000 from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
&
Hi all,
I plan to change the master branch of the website repository to contain the
new Hugo site rather than the old Sphinx site, later today. I will help
with migrating git branches if anyone needs such help.
Aside: two longer messages on this topic got blocked by some weird new
Gmail spam filt
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:54 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> We recently officially exposed and documented[0] the C-API side of
> numpy.random. There are now working examples[3] of using numpy.random
> from numba[1], cython[2], and cffi[5].
>
>
> Please try this out before the 1.18 rel
Hi all,
We now have "Triage-review" and "Triaged" labels, to go with the bi-weekly
meeting we will start with this week. For those that missed it in the notes
from the sprint: the idea is to change from the weekly "community call"
meetings to:
1. a bi-weekly community call with higher-level topic
301 - 400 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
