The NEP was merged in draft form, see below.
https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0055-string_dtype.html
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:36 PM Nathan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just opened a pull request to add NEP 55, see
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/24483.
>
> Per NEP 0, I've copied everything up to
Hi Pieter,
Thanks for pointing this PR out. That certainly fixes the immediate problem
with the inconsistent print statements that I highlighted in my original
message.
It doesn't address the more fundamental problem, though, which is that the
default behavior is to represent the polynomial in
