On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 13:07 -0800, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, at 12:27, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Okay, as long as we keep in mind that it should contain all these
> > not-for-main-namespace functions/classes, it seems fine with me. We
> > can live with two namespaces (`types`
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:08 PM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, at 12:27, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> Okay, as long as we keep in mind that it should contain all these
> not-for-main-namespace functions/classes, it seems fine with me. We can
> live with two namespaces (`types` and
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 10:34 -0700, Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 3:31 AM Sebastian Berg <
> sebast...@sipsolutions.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering if we should introduce a new `np.types` namespace.
> > The
> > main reason is that we have the DType classes, that most
I'm not sure I understand the objection to having "too many submodules",
but if it's a concern, the exceptions could be added here instead of a
separate np.exceptions, since exceptions are themselves just types.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:33 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-0
