Re: [Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

2020-02-06 Thread Aldcroft, Thomas
Our organization is still using CentOS-6, so my vote is for that. Thanks, Tom On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:38 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Pretty sure the 2010 and 2014 images both have much newer compilers than > that. > > There are still a lot of users on CentOS 6, so I'd still stick to 2010 for >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

2020-02-06 Thread Neal Becker
Slightly off topic perhaps, it is recommended to perform custom compilation for best performance, yet is there an easy way to do this? I don't think a simple pip will do. On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:07 AM Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:38 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

2020-02-05 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:38 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > Pretty sure the 2010 and 2014 images both have much newer compilers than that. > > There are still a lot of users on CentOS 6, so I'd still stick to 2010 for > now on x86_64 at least. We could potentially start adding 2014 wheels for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

2020-02-04 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Pretty sure the 2010 and 2014 images both have much newer compilers than that. There are still a lot of users on CentOS 6, so I'd still stick to 2010 for now on x86_64 at least. We could potentially start adding 2014 wheels for the other platforms where we currently don't ship wheels – gotta be be

[Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

2020-02-04 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Thought now would be a good time to decide on upgrading manylinux for the 1.19 release so that we can make sure that everything works as expected. The choices are manylinux1 -- CentOS 5, currently used, gcc 4.2 (in practice 4.5), only supports i