[Numpy-discussion] we have a NumPy PyPI organization now

2025-06-16 Thread Ralf Gommers via NumPy-Discussion
Hi all, Now that PyPI has organizations and they came out of beta and the application queue cleared, I applied for a NumPy organization and that just came through (https://pypi.org/org/numpy/). We can start moving projects under that now, so it'll look more like https://pypi.org/org/scipy/. For th

[Numpy-discussion] We

2019-12-03 Thread Aswin Venu
Ssszezr ssßez ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] we held an impromptu dtype brainstorming sesison at SciPy

2018-07-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
A few quick things that jumped out at me: - I think the discussion of __array_ufunc__ on dtypes is confused. Dtypes already have a generic mechanism for overriding ufuncs (the ufunc loop dispatch mechanism), it's separate from __array_ufunc__ (so in theory you could e.g. have a user-defined array

Re: [Numpy-discussion] we held an impromptu dtype brainstorming sesison at SciPy

2018-07-14 Thread Gael Varoquaux
Thank you so much to everybody involved; this is important for the ecosystem. Gaël On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 03:39:25PM -0500, Matti Picus wrote: > The stars all aligned properly and some of the steering committee suggested > we put together a quick brainstorming session over what to do with dtypes

[Numpy-discussion] we held an impromptu dtype brainstorming sesison at SciPy

2018-07-14 Thread Matti Picus
The stars all aligned properly and some of the steering committee suggested we put together a quick brainstorming session over what to do with dtypes. About 20 people joined in the discussion which was very productive. We began with user stories and design requirements, and asked some present t