+1 for a conflict of interest policy. A member of another group reviewing
and pulling a change is a reasonable expectation. Explicit is better than
implicit.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 17:35 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Matthew,
>> >
>> > > it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring
>> > > bluepri
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 17:35 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
> wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > > it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring
> > > blueprint with a relatively small amount of effort.
> >
> > My sentence
Hi,
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
>> it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring blueprint
>> with a relatively small amount of effort.
>
> My sentence "adapt the typical academic rule for conflicts of
> interests to PRs, that non
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My sentence "adapt the typical academic rule for conflicts of
> interests to PRs, that non-trivial ones cannot be merged by someone
> who has a conflict of interest with the author, i.e., it cannot be a
> s
Hi Matthew,
> it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring blueprint
> with a relatively small amount of effort.
My sentence "adapt the typical academic rule for conflicts of
interests to PRs, that non-trivial ones cannot be merged by someone
who has a conflict of interest wit
Hi,
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> First, it will be great to have more people developing! On avoiding
> potential conflicts: I'm not overly worried, in part because of my
> experience with astropy (for which NASA support developers at STScI
> and CXC).
Hi All,
First, it will be great to have more people developing! On avoiding
potential conflicts: I'm not overly worried, in part because of my
experience with astropy (for which NASA support developers at STScI
and CXC). One possible solution for trying to avoid them would be to
adapt the typical
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi all,
As
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
>>> try to se
Okay, a few more details :-)
The initial funding here is a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation to UCB with me as PI, in the amount of $645,020. There's
also another thing in the pipeline that might supplement that, but
it'll be
~6 months yet before we know for sure. So keep your finge
Great news, Nathaniel! It was a huge boost to matplotlib a couple of years
ago when we got an FTE, even if it was just for a few months. While that
effort didn't directly produce any new features, we were able to overhaul
some very old parts of the codebase. Probably why the effort was so
successfu
Hi,
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
>> try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that I can now
>> officially an
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Awesome! This is really great news.
>
> Does this mean is several person-years of funding secured?
Yes – hoping to give more details there soon. (There's nothing dire
and secretive, it's just the logistics of getting an announc
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
>> try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that I can now
>> officially announce
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
> try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that I can now
> officially announce that BIDS [1] is planning to hire several folks
> specifically to work
Awesome! This is really great news.
Does this mean is several person-years of funding secured?
-CHB
> On May 13, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
> try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that
Hi all,
As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that I can now
officially announce that BIDS [1] is planning to hire several folks
specifically to work on NumPy. These will full time positions at UC
Berkeley, postdoc or s
18 matches
Mail list logo
