On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 9:09 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> So my proposal is to drop all the Docker Hub and Gitpod related code and
> docs. I have already discussed this with Tania Allard, who did most of the
> heavy lifting on the initial creation of the Gitpod machinery (for SciPy,
> which was the
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:20 PM Klaus Zimmermann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this sounds all reasonable to me, and as mostly a lurker on this list my
> input shouldn't carry too much weight anyway.
>
> I wanted to point out one thing: Docker does continue to offer free
> access for Open Source projects, it
Hi all,
As a heavy user of Gitpod (mostly for quick fixes) I would also like to
point out that you *can* still use it - it's just that the development
environment won't be set up by default. I agree it has been breaking far
too often and requires a lot of optimization to reach reasonable setup
tim
Hi,
this sounds all reasonable to me, and as mostly a lurker on this list my
input shouldn't carry too much weight anyway.
I wanted to point out one thing: Docker does continue to offer free
access for Open Source projects, it's just that they restructured the
way of how to do this. So if th
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:13 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We received a notification from Docker that there Free Team organization
> no longer exists, and that we have until April 14 to upgrade to a paid
> tier. We only use Docker to support Gitpod. Gitpod builds have been broken
> in mai
I'm in favor of dropping Gitpod, IMO during sprints as well, it yielded less
utility than expected initially, and breaks far too often (as summarized
above). It would also be good to be free from docker rot given their recent
changes.
--- Rohit
On Mar 20 2023, at 9:09 pm, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
