On 6/11/21 6:56 pm, Sayed Adel wrote:
> appears to be poorly optimized.
It should perform well, not poor neither heavily optimized.
> this also makes it quite difficult to improve (with either a better
compiler or by hand).
We can put the blame on Intel for not sharing their source code but
> appears to be poorly optimized.
It should perform well, not poor neither heavily optimized.
> this also makes it quite difficult to improve (with either a better compiler
> or by hand).
We can put the blame on Intel for not sharing their source code but honestly,
it seems we had no other optio
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 1:18 PM Noah Goldstein
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM Devulapalli, Raghuveer
> wrote:
> >
> > They are meant to be optimized. Any contribution to improve them further
> is more than welcome.
>
> Fantastic. I don't see any tests for any of the functions in there.
>
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM Devulapalli, Raghuveer
wrote:
>
> They are meant to be optimized. Any contribution to improve them further is
> more than welcome.
Fantastic. I don't see any tests for any of the functions in there.
Does anyone know where I
can find them?
>
> Raghuveer
>
> -Ori
They are meant to be optimized. Any contribution to improve them further is
more than welcome.
Raghuveer
-Original Message-
From: Noah Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 10:46 AM
To: numpy-discussion@python.org
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] [RFC] - numpy/SVML appears to be poorl
