On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
wrote:
> Agreed on accepting the NEP! But it is not the first proposal to accept
> under the new rules - that goes to the broadcasting NEP (though perhaps I
> wasn't sufficiently explicit in stating that I was starting a
> count-down...). -- Mar
Agreed on accepting the NEP! But it is not the first proposal to accept
under the new rules - that goes to the broadcasting NEP (though perhaps I
wasn't sufficiently explicit in stating that I was starting a
count-down...). -- Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion
Note that this is the first formal proposal to accept a NEP using our
new process (yay!). While writing it I realized that the current text
about this in NEP 0 is a bit terse, so I've also just submitted a PR
to expand that section:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11459
-n
On Fri, Jun 29, 20
Hi all,
I propose that we accept NEP 15: Merging multiarray and umath:
http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0015-merge-multiarray-umath.html
The core part of this proposal was uncontroversial. The main point of
discussion was whether it was OK to deprecate set_numeric_ops, or
whether it had some legiti
