Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status – Store quantity in a NumPy array and convert it :)

2021-05-11 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:27 -0500, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 17:12 -0500, Sebastian Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 07:56 -0500, Lee Johnston wrote: > > > > > 3. In parallel, I will create a small "toy" DType based on that > >    experimental API.  Probably in a separat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status – Store quantity in a NumPy array and convert it :)

2021-03-26 Thread Lee Johnston
Thanks Sebastian, I have your example running and will start experimenting with DType. Lee On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 5:32 PM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 17:12 -0500, Sebastian Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 07:56 -0500, Lee Johnston wrote: > > > > > 3. In parallel, I wil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status – Store quantity in a NumPy array and convert it :)

2021-03-25 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 17:12 -0500, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 07:56 -0500, Lee Johnston wrote: > 3. In parallel, I will create a small "toy" DType based on that >    experimental API.  Probably in a separate repo (in the NumPy >    organization?). > So this is started. What

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status

2021-03-17 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 07:56 -0500, Lee Johnston wrote: > I am willing to wait for PR #18398 as I am mainly interested at this > point > in the process of developing a new DType and then array coercion and > casting. > > Does _rational_tests.c.src > < > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/main/num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status

2021-03-17 Thread Lee Johnston
I am willing to wait for PR #18398 as I am mainly interested at this point in the process of developing a new DType and then array coercion and casting. Does _rational_tests.c.src illustrate the new DType? On Tu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status

2021-03-16 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 13:17 -0500, Lee Johnston wrote: > Is the work on NEP 42 custom DTypes far enough along to experiment > with? > TL;DR: Its not quite ready, but if we work together I think we could experiment a fair bit. Mainly ufuncs are still limited (though not quite completely missing)

[Numpy-discussion] NEP 42 status

2021-03-16 Thread Lee Johnston
Is the work on NEP 42 custom DTypes far enough along to experiment with? Lee ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion