Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.19 release

2019-10-13 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 19:20 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an NEP for the > 1.18 release like Python does PEPs. If that is considered too > procedural for releases that come out every six months or so, are > there any suggestions

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.19 release

2019-10-13 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 7:14 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:58 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.19 release

2019-10-12 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:58 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an NEP for the >> 1.18 release like Python does PEPs. If that is considered to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.19 release

2019-10-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an NEP for the 1.18 > release like Python does PEPs. If that is considered too procedural for > releases that come out every six months or so, are there any suggestions > f

[Numpy-discussion] 1.19 release

2019-10-11 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Thought I'd raise the option of trying to put together an NEP for the 1.18 release like Python does PEPs. If that is considered too procedural for releases that come out every six months or so, are there any suggestions for an alternative? About 1.19 itself, I expect to fork 1.18.x in the