On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:44 PM Charles R Harris via NumPy-Discussion <
numpy-discussion@python.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just thought I would raise the topic of PyPy status in NumPy 2.3. PyPy for
> Python 3.11 currently has a bug which has hung around for a while,
>
Is it relevant? There are of c
Hi All,
Just thought I would raise the topic of PyPy status in NumPy 2.3. PyPy for
Python 3.11 currently has a bug which has hung around for a while, and it
is also likely that there will be no PyPy for Python 3.12. It looks like
PyPy is reaching end of life, and this seems a good time to decide i
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:52:33PM +0200, PIERRE AUGIER via NumPy-Discussion
wrote:
> > "If the goal is to run psycopg3 fast in PyPy, there are at least three
> > paths:
> >
> >use a cffi backend: this is likely to be the fastest one
> >(in case psycopg uses Cython and doesn't call direc
- Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Krah"
> À: "numpy-discussion"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Mai 2025 13:47:19
> Objet: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Better compatibility of the Python
> scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:08:36PM +0200, PIERRE AUGIER wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:08:36PM +0200, PIERRE AUGIER wrote:
> It seems to me that a strategy based on HPy would give practical benefices
> for users in a much shorter time (typically few years) than just waiting for
> CPython C API evolution.
It would be nice to use alternative interpreters,
