Our next Newcomers' Hour will be held tomorrow, December 1st, at 12 pm UTC.
Stop by to ask questions or just to say hi.
To add to the meeting agenda the topics you’d like to discuss, follow the
link: https://hackmd.io/3f3otyyuTte3FU9y3QzsLg?both
Join the meeting via Zoom:
https://us06web.zoom.us/
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:55 PM Serge Guelton
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:09:02PM +0100, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing this up again. The Python method exists and it
> > seems like relatively basic functionality.
> >
> > Overall, I am slightly in favor of adding the ufunc
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 7:10 PM Marko Pacak wrote:
> Hi Ralf, thx for replying to this.
>
> > I'd prefer to tell users to use `np.asarray()` on their inputs instead.
>
> How would you do that? Through a warning in the test suite? Or document it
> somewhere?
>
The docstring for array_equal should
Hi Ralf, thx for replying to this.
> I'd prefer to tell users to use `np.asarray()` on their inputs instead.
How would you do that? Through a warning in the test suite? Or document it
somewhere?
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@py
Hi Sebastian, all,
I’d lean towards an error too, given that the invariants implied by the Python
implementation clearly aren‘t met. No strong opinions though.
Best regards,
Hameer Abbasi
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 30.11.2022 um 18:36 schrieb Sebastian Berg :
>
> Hi all,
>
> there is a
Hi all,
there is a discussion about how `round(array)` should behave in:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6248
There is some discussion about object arrays which should probably be
fixed for `around()` in that ago.
Otherwise, the is the question what to do about the fact that:
* round
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 14:51 -0700, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:36 AM Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to formally propose accepting NEP 51. Without any
> > concern
> > voiced, we will consider it accepted within 7 days.
> >
> > * Clearly we ca
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:24 AM Matti Picus wrote:
>
> On 30/11/22 05:47, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, at 07:21, i...@markopacak.com wrote:
> >> The debate is whether np.testing.asset_equal should support
> >> collections.Sequence objects.
> > assert list(sequence1) == li
On 30/11/22 05:47, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, at 07:21, i...@markopacak.com wrote:
The debate is whether np.testing.asset_equal should support
collections.Sequence objects.
assert list(sequence1) == list(sequence2)
should do the trick, and also handles int vs float and n
