Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Typing presentation and discussion on Wednesday! (As part of the NumPy Community Meeting)

Hi Stéfan, To what potential PEP are you referring exactly? Type arithmetic or automatically interpret `1` as `Literal[1]` wherever it makes sense? Indeed to have a common repository with an initial document would be a good way to go. So far we did not start anything because the PEP on Va

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Typing presentation and discussion on Wednesday! (As part of the NumPy Community Meeting)

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 11:12, ALFONSO LUIS CASTAÑO MARIN wrote: > To what potential PEP are you referring exactly? Type arithmetic or > automatically interpret `1` as `Literal[1]` wherever it makes sense? I guess both, but particularly the first (using standard operators in type definitions).

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Typing presentation and discussion on Wednesday! (As part of the NumPy Community Meeting)

Hi Alfonso, Matthew, On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 06:59, ALFONSO LUIS CASTAÑO MARIN wrote: > First of all, when talking about type arithmetic I suggest to refer to the > latest presentation for the summit rather than from the Tensor Typing > Meetings > (https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NZzZ

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Typing presentation and discussion on Wednesday! (As part of the NumPy Community Meeting)

Hi Matthew & Juan, Thank you for the kind words and for the feedback! I totally agree in what you are suggesting, so I will just provide a little of context on why it was presented that way. First of all, when talking about type arithmetic I suggest to refer to the latest presentation for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 36- fair play (was: request to remove the numpy-aarch64 package from PyPI)

On 14/6/21 11:03 pm, Stefan van der Walt wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, at 18:21, Charles R Harris wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 10:47 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: FYI, I noticed this package that claimed to be maintained by us: https://pypi.org/project/num