On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:08 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 12:37 +0100, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:41 PM Sebastian Berg <
> > sebast...@sipsolutions.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Top Posting, to discuss post specific questions about NEP 47 and
> > > partially
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 14:59 +0100, Peter Andreas Entschev wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Thanks for pinging me. To put it in the simplest way possible, that
> PR
> adds a new `like` kwarg that will dispatch to downstream libraries
> using `__array_function__` when specified, otherwise fallback to the
> d
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for pinging me. To put it in the simplest way possible, that PR
adds a new `like` kwarg that will dispatch to downstream libraries
using `__array_function__` when specified, otherwise fallback to the
default behavior of NumPy. While that introduces an extra check on the
C side, t
- Mail original -
> De: "Juan Nunez-Iglesias"
> À: "numpy-discussion"
> Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Mars 2021 07:15:39
> Objet: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Looking for a difference between Numpy 0.19.5
> and 0.20 explaining a perf regression with
> Pythran
> Hi Pierre,
>
> If you’re able to compil
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:14:13 +
Peter Cock wrote:
> I'm impressed to see 17 million conda-forge numpy downloads, vs
> 'just' 2.5 million downloads of the default channel's package:
I doubt the download figures from conda are correct ...
A couple of days after my software package has entered
