On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:48 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
wrote:
> I totally agree with the namespace clutter concern, but honestly, I would
> use `atleast_nd` with its `pos` argument (I might rename it to `position`,
> `axis`, or `axis_position`) any day over `at_least{1,2,3}d`, for which I
> had no i
I totally agree with the namespace clutter concern, but honestly, I would use
`atleast_nd` with its `pos` argument (I might rename it to `position`, `axis`,
or `axis_position`) any day over `at_least{1,2,3}d`, for which I had no idea
where the new axes would end up.
So, I’m in favour of includi
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 17:31 -0500, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz wrote:
> I've created PR#18386 to add a function called atleast_nd to numpy
> and
> numpy.ma. This would generalize the existing atleast_1d, atleast_2d,
> and
> atleast_3d functions.
>
> I proposed a similar idea about four and a half years
I've created PR#18386 to add a function called atleast_nd to numpy and
numpy.ma. This would generalize the existing atleast_1d, atleast_2d, and
atleast_3d functions.
I proposed a similar idea about four and a half years ago:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2016-July/075722.html,
