On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 00:20 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> > Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is
> > there no
> > mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner
On 9/29/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
>> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
>> mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner loop. And pushing this parti
On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
> mechanism to do that today?
Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
detected in an inner loop. And pushing this particular error
detection into the inner loop does
On 9/28/19, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 13:15 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
>> On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
>> > NumPy devs,
>> >
>> > NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
>> > (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html)
>> > has
>> > been accep
On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 13:15 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> > NumPy devs,
> >
> > NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
> > (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html)
> > has
> > been accepted.
>
> CI gurus: the web page containing
Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
mechanism to do that today?
I don't think you were proposing that core dimensions should _never_ be
allowed to be 0, but if you were I disagree. I spent a fair amount of work
enabling that for linalg because it provided some
I'm experimenting with gufuncs, and I just created a simple one with
signature '(i)->()'. Is there a way to configure the gufunc itself so
that an empty array results in an error? Or would I have to create a
Python wrapper around the gufunc that does the error checking?
Currently, when passed an
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:23 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> On 9/28/2019 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > I'm actually pleased that the install succeeded on Window, although you
> won't have good BLAS/LAPACK, just the numpy C versions of lapack_lite. The
> warning/error is a bit
> > concerning thou
On 9/28/2019 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I'm actually pleased that the install succeeded on Window, although you won't have good BLAS/LAPACK, just the numpy C versions of lapack_lite. The warning/error is a bit
concerning though, it would be nice to know if it is from Python3.8 pip or numpy
On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> NumPy devs,
>
> NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
> (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html) has
> been accepted.
CI gurus: the web page containing the rendered NEPs,
https://numpy.org/neps/, has not updated since the pull req
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 9:45 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:12 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> >> Upgrading numpy with pip on Python 3.8b4 on Win 10
> >> produced:
> >> ERROR: Could not install packages due to an
> >> EnvironmentError: [WinError 123] The filename,
>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:12 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
Upgrading numpy with pip on Python 3.8b4 on Win 10
produced:
ERROR: Could not install packages due to an
EnvironmentError: [WinError 123] The filename,
directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect:
'"C:'
H
12 matches
Mail list logo
