Re: [Numpy-discussion] prpp report—please help review!

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, at 13:30, Ralf Gommers wrote: > All the links to PRs below are broken - if you have a script that's easy to > change, could you resend with fixed links? Sorry, looks like I posted the API endpoints. Here's a working version, including everyone with >= 5 PRs: *Top 10 PR con

Re: [Numpy-discussion] prpp report—please help review!

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:09 PM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > During the community call today, we drew up a list of open PR counts per > developer. We are working towards bringing down their number (around 240 > today), and would appreciate it if you could help us review and/or m

[Numpy-discussion] prpp report—please help review!

Hi everyone, During the community call today, we drew up a list of open PR counts per developer. We are working towards bringing down their number (around 240 today), and would appreciate it if you could help us review and/or make decisions. NumPy also has 1760 open issues

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Outreachy Program Aspirant

On 20/3/19 12:20 pm, rishab lamba wrote: Hi, I am Rishab Lamba undergoing my B.Tech from BVCOE, India. As an applicant from Outreachy, I was going through this project https://www.outreachy.org/may-2019-august-2019-outreachy-internships/communities/numpy/#improve-c-api-documentation-for-numpy

[Numpy-discussion] Outreachy Program Aspirant

Hi, I am Rishab Lamba undergoing my B.Tech from BVCOE, India. As an applicant from Outreachy, I was going through this project https://www.outreachy.org/may-2019-august-2019-outreachy-internships/communities/numpy/#improve-c-api-documentation-for-numpy and would like to work on it. I was not aware