Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:58 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:27 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > >> I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level >> array functions": >> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html >> >> Since the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:27 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level > array functions": > http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html > > Since the last round of discussion, we added a new section on "Callable > object

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rescuing missing data documents

2018-09-02 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Makes sense to me On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently a few people (Tyler, Matti, myself, maybe others?) were discussing > the history of missing data in the context of custom dtypes. I mentioned > that there was a good write-up, but couldn't find it at the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rescuing missing data documents

2018-09-02 Thread Stefan van der Walt
On September 2, 2018 06:16:36 Ralf Gommers wrote: I'd like to see the NEPs rescued, and the summary moved from the numpy.org repo (maybe into yet another NEP?). It would be best if the original authors do this, but otherwise I'm happy to do it. Thoughts? I think this is an excellent suggestio