That would be great. I just used np.argsort because it was familiar to
me. Didn't know about the C code.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While #9211 is a good start, it is pretty inefficient in terms of the fact
> that it performs an O
While #9211 is a good start, it is pretty inefficient in terms of the fact
that it performs an O(nlogn) sort of the array. It is possible to reduce
the time to O(n) by using a similar partitioning algorithm to the one in
the C code of percentile. I will look into it as soon as I can.
-Joe
On
Just to provide some context, 9213 actually spawned off of this guy:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/9211
which might address the weighted inputs issue Joe brought up.
C
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that there would be
I think that there would be a very good reason to have a separate function
if we were to introduce weights to the inputs, similarly to the way that we
have mean and average. This would have some (positive) repercussions like
making weighted histograms with the Freedman-Diaconis binwidth estimator a
There's an ongoing effort to introduce quantile() into numpy. You'd use it
just like percentile(), but would input your q value in probability space
(0.5 for 50%):
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/9213
Since there's a great deal of overlap between these two functions, we'd
like to solicit opi
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 12:59 -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2017 9:36 AM, "Sebastian Berg" > wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:58 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> > On 21.07.2017 08:52, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Also FWIW, the jupyter steering council is currently 15 people, or 16
> including
On Jul 21, 2017 9:36 AM, "Sebastian Berg"
wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:58 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 21.07.2017 08:52, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It has been well over a year since we put together the governance
> > structure and steering council
> > (https://docs.scipy.org/
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:58 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 21.07.2017 08:52, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It has been well over a year since we put together the governance
> > structure and steering council
> > (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/dev/governance/people.html#go
> > ve
On 21.07.2017 08:52, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been well over a year since we put together the governance
> structure and steering council
> (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/dev/governance/people.html#governance-people).
> We haven't reviewed the people on the steering council
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been well over a year since we put together the governance
> structure and steering council (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/
> numpy-dev/dev/governance/people.html#governance-people). We haven't
> reviewed the people on the ste
10 matches
Mail list logo
