The best way to get good optimized code is to find it. Does this do what
you want?
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.interpolate.Rbf.html
For some advice here, first avoid loops in Python and instead stick to
ufuncs and broadcasting. It looks like the matrix is symmetri
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:05:47 +1300, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
> [clip]
> > The move is complete, and I have updated the mailing list addresses at:
> > - http://scipy.org/scipylib/mailing-lists.html (done)
> > - numpy codebase (PR https://github.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > The bigger challenge is deciding what to do -- the bikeshedding -- and
> > the backward incompatibility issues. IIRC, when this came up on the
> > list, there was nothing like consensus on exactly what to do and how
> > to do it.
>
> TBH
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:05:47 +1300, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
> The move is complete, and I have updated the mailing list addresses at:
> - http://scipy.org/scipylib/mailing-lists.html (done)
> - numpy codebase (PR https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/8840)
> - scipy codebase (PR https://github.c
Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:21:37 -0700, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>
>> - add ascii/latin1 dtype to support a compact python3 string array,
>> deprecate 's' dtype which has different meaning in python2 and 3 This
>> one is probably too big for 3k th
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> - add ascii/latin1 dtype to support a compact python3 string array,
> deprecate 's' dtype which has different meaning in python2 and 3
> This one is probably too big for 3k though.
>
probably -- but not THAT
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 13:06 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've timed the two versions, one basisfunction being a function:
>
> 1 loop, best of 3: 17.3 s per loop
>
> the other one, basisfunction being a list of functions:
>
> 1 loop, best of 3: 33.5 s per loop
>
> > To be honest, I
Hey,
I've timed the two versions, one basisfunction being a function:
1 loop, best of 3: 17.3 s per loop
the other one, basisfunction being a list of functions:
1 loop, best of 3: 33.5 s per loop
> To be honest, I am a bit surprised that its a problem, since "basis
> function" sounds a bit lik
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I have two ideas under one big important topic: make numpy python3
> compatible.
>
> The first fits pretty well with the grant size and nobody wants to do it
> for free:
> - fix our text IO functions under py
I have two ideas under one big important topic: make numpy python3
compatible.
The first fits pretty well with the grant size and nobody wants to do it
for free:
- fix our text IO functions under python3 and support multiple
encodings, not only latin1.
Reasonably simple to do, slap encoding argume
Hi all,
For those who did not see the call on the NumFOCUS list, the below may be
of interest.
I also have a proposal idea: a redesign of numpy.org. Our website is very
poor, both in terms of content and design. If a good designer spends 40
hours on it, that should be enough to change it into som
11 matches
Mail list logo
