carterkozak commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785030436
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
vorburger opened a new pull request #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/699
The original 15 was blindly copied from SLF4JProvider (by myself).
It's probably better to not have them be the same, and have To-JUL's higher
than SLF4j's (which in turn is higher than C
vorburger commented on pull request #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/699#issuecomment-1013339724
@carterkozak
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
vorburger opened a new pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700
With this StatusLogger uses default status level configured from property
not just for listeners but all its logging.
This fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3340 for me.
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785067137
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785068359
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
vorburger commented on pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#issuecomment-1013361743
> Please see my comments/questions. TY!
Done!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
carterkozak commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785072734
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
carterkozak commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785073240
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785075733
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785078943
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785079189
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
carterkozak commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785083277
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
garydgregory commented on pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#issuecomment-1013424236
I approved the PR but as my comments are resolved. I'll let @carterkozak
give the final nod.đŸ˜‰
TY @vorburger
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
carterkozak commented on pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#issuecomment-1013429061
Thanks, Gary :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
carterkozak commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785134421
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
garydgregory commented on pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700#issuecomment-1013433366
Anything that makes it easier to use is fine by me.
Any thoughts @rgoers ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698#discussion_r785153033
##
File path:
log4j-to-jul/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/tojul/LazyLog4jLogRecord.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
carterkozak commented on pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700#issuecomment-1013461189
Are the test failures related to this change?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
rgoers commented on pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700#issuecomment-1013480001
I'm not sure we have that many tests on StatusLogger. This change looks like
it makes sense to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
carterkozak merged pull request #698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/698
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
carterkozak merged pull request #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/699
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
carterkozak merged pull request #701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/701
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
carterkozak merged pull request #696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/696
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
rm5248 merged pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/101
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificat
rm5248 merged pull request #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/100
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificat
strugerk opened a new pull request #703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/703
fix Appenders DeleteAction didn't work when basepath is symbolicLink.
jira:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3342

RollingPolicyBase::Rolli
strugerk commented on a change in pull request #703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/703#discussion_r785426539
##
File path:
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rolling/action/AbstractPathAction.java
##
@@ -103,7 +103,15 @@ public
rm5248 commented on a change in pull request #102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/102#discussion_r785460548
##
File path: src/main/cpp/rollingpolicybase.cpp
##
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ IMPLEMENT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(RollingPolicyBase)
RollingPolicyBase::RollingPolicy
garydgregory commented on pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#issuecomment-1013915115
Hello @ppkarwasz
Thank you for your PR. You must have missed in Jira that the ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3328 was assigned to me, so we
w
garydgregory merged pull request #702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/702
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: noti
ppkarwasz closed pull request #705:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/705
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notific
ppkarwasz commented on pull request #705:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/705#issuecomment-1013945398
Sorry, I wanted to modify #704 instead.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
ppkarwasz commented on pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#issuecomment-1013950184
Sorry @garydgregory,
I didn't plan to provide a fix to LOG4J2-3328 at first, but some of the
tests the I copied from `Log4j1ConfigurationFactoryTest` were failing
ppkarwasz edited a comment on pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#issuecomment-1013950184
Sorry @garydgregory,
I didn't plan to provide a fix to LOG4J2-3328 at first, but some of the
tests I copied from `Log4j1ConfigurationFactoryTest` were fail
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#discussion_r785534352
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/builders/AbstractBuilder.java
##
@@ -86,12 +86,25 @@ protected String getNameAttribu
ppkarwasz commented on a change in pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#discussion_r785539228
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/builders/AbstractBuilder.java
##
@@ -86,12 +86,25 @@ protected String getNameAttribute(
rgoers commented on pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#issuecomment-1013972910
Yeah - I would appreciate this being split into a series of PRs. I got part
of that through and didn't see anything terribly concerning but I also did dig
as deep as I woul
ppkarwasz commented on a change in pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#discussion_r785540531
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/builders/AbstractBuilder.java
##
@@ -86,12 +86,25 @@ protected String getNameAttribute(
ppkarwasz commented on a change in pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#discussion_r785540531
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/builders/AbstractBuilder.java
##
@@ -86,12 +86,25 @@ protected String getNameAttribute(
ppkarwasz closed pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notific
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706
`Log4j1ConfigurationFactoryTest` contains many interesting tests that fail
if we apply them to the `PropertiesConfigurationFactory` and
`XmlConfigurationFactory` that replaced `Log4j1Configurat
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/707
Log4j 1.x allows for both capitalized (`InfoLocation`) and Java-style
(`infoLocation`) component property names (`PropertySetter` calls
`Introspector.decapitalize`). This PR allows for Java-sty
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/708
Since not all Log4j 1.x component builders extend `AbstractBuilder`,
`BuilderManager#createBuilder` throws a `ClassCastException` when instantiating
some of them.
For example using a `Si
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/709
The default values used by `TTCCLayoutBuilder` were different from those
used by Log4j 1.x.
This PR fixes the tests concerning the `TTCCLayout` from #706.
--
This is an automated messa
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/710
The Log4j 1.x bridge incorrectly sets the pattern of the rolling file
appenders. Moreover the `RollingFileAppender` did not have a time based
triggering policy in the original Log4j 1.x.
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/711
The Log4j 1.x bridge should arguably use the `Log4j1XmlLayout` instead of
the Log4j 2.x specific `XmlLayout`. That is also the layout used by the older
`Log4j1ConfigurationFactory`.
This
ppkarwasz commented on pull request #704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/704#issuecomment-1013999717
I split this PR into 6 smaller ones: #706, #707, #708, #709, #710, #711.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
swebb2066 opened a new pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103
Currently, the examples use ${XMLLIB_LIBRARIES} while tests and the log4cxx
library use EXPAT::EXPAT.
This PR aims to localise in the top level CMakeLists.txt the expat library
referenc
rm5248 commented on pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103#issuecomment-1014095458
Would it make more sense to merge this into master instead of next_stable?
Otherwise it looks good to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
swebb2066 commented on pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103#issuecomment-1014152730
It occurred to me I should hande bot types of find result.
If this is OK I will cherry-pick to a master destined PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
swebb2066 edited a comment on pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103#issuecomment-1014152730
It occurred to me I should hande both types of find result.
If this is OK I will cherry-pick to a master destined PR.
--
This is an automated message fro
ams-tschoening commented on a change in pull request #102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/102#discussion_r785672563
##
File path: src/main/cpp/rollingpolicybase.cpp
##
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ IMPLEMENT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(RollingPolicyBase)
RollingPolicyBase::Rolli
swebb2066 opened a new pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/105
This PR is further work towards fixing LOGCXX-532.
I believe localstatics are thread safe since C++11
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
atulpendse commented on pull request #683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/683#issuecomment-1014358483
@vy @garydgregory anything else that I should do to make progress on this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/683#discussion_r785986466
##
File path:
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/SyslogAppender.java
##
@@ -300,6 +307,11 @@ public B setLoggerFie
garydgregory commented on pull request #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/711#issuecomment-1014522355
Hello @ppkarwasz
Thank you for your PR.
We need a matching test that fails if the main changes are reverted,
otherwise, there is no way to know why this change
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/709#discussion_r785996466
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/builders/AbstractBuilder.java
##
@@ -91,7 +91,11 @@ protected String getValueAttribu
garydgregory commented on pull request #708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/708#issuecomment-1014529504
"Since not all Log4j 1.x component builders extend AbstractBuilder,
BuilderManager#createBuilder throws a ClassCastException when instantiating
some of them."
garydgregory commented on pull request #707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/707#issuecomment-1014536381
Hi @ppkarwasz
You need tests to fail without these main changes to show the main changes
actually fix something. Otherwise, future changes might just reintroduce t
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706#discussion_r786004843
##
File path:
log4j-1.2-api/src/test/java/org/apache/log4j/config/AbstractLog4j1ConfigurationTest.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
garydgregory commented on pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700#issuecomment-1014541566
> Are the test failures related to this change?
I just started a re-run of all the jobs. Let's see if the build passes.
--
This is an automated message from t
rm5248 commented on pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/105#issuecomment-1014550892
One (potential) issue that I see here is that because the variables are
still declared as `static`, they may get destroyed when the application is
exiting(but another thre
ppkarwasz commented on pull request #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/711#issuecomment-1014635782
This modification is tested by
`AbstractLog4j1ConfigurationTest.testConsoleXmlLayout()` I submitted in #706.
That PR is hard to split into parts without generating many
garydgregory commented on pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706#issuecomment-1014655999
Hi @ppkarwasz
Failing a build is not going to be acceptable IMO. Because different team
members work at different times and availability, like me, I don't want to
garydgregory edited a comment on pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706#issuecomment-1014655999
Hi @ppkarwasz
Failing a build is not going to be acceptable IMO. Because different team
members work at different times and availability, like me, I don't w
ppkarwasz closed pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notific
ppkarwasz commented on pull request #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/706#issuecomment-1014676863
I'll move the tests to the PRs that actually fix bugs, then. Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
jvz commented on a change in pull request #683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/683#discussion_r786137086
##
File path:
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/SyslogAppender.java
##
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@
@PluginElement("Logger
rm5248 commented on pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103#issuecomment-1014708051
looks good to me.
I prefer to merge into master and then merge master into next_stable
manually once I have a few changes(so I don't have to do the same fix twice),
carterkozak opened a new pull request #712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/712
These tests provide additional coverage in the event parameters
are passed through, demonstrating how JUL formatters are likely
to misinterpret such LogRecords.
--
This is an automated
carterkozak closed pull request #714:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/714
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
vy merged pull request #691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/691
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-
vy merged pull request #14:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/pull/14
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
vy merged pull request #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/pull/15
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
vy commented on pull request #15:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/pull/15#issuecomment-1014915107
@pjfanning, thanks for the contribution. For
[scala-api.html](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/scala-api.html),
search for `scala-api.*` files in [Log4j 2](/apac
pjfanning commented on pull request #15:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/pull/15#issuecomment-1014919650
@vy I just added https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/715 - I will
create a 2nd PR (for master) when the first one is merged.
--
This is an automated mess
vy merged pull request #715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/715
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-
vy merged pull request #716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/716
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-
carterkozak opened a new pull request #717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/717
draft, I need to validate performance related to the original reason this
ran on another thread: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2867
Now that the serviceloader is guarded
swebb2066 merged pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/103
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifi
swebb2066 merged pull request #104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/104
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifi
carterkozak commented on pull request #717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/717#issuecomment-1014986859
@rgoers I can't seem to find the performance test you added as
`log4j-core/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/LoggingTest.java`
In the original issue, initi
carterkozak merged pull request #713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/713
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
carterkozak merged pull request #712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/712
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notif
swebb2066 commented on pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/105#issuecomment-1015034924
If `static` objects are being destroyed while another thread is logging,
then `APRInitializer` is also destroyed (which is bad). So all logging activity
must be stopped
swebb2066 edited a comment on pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/105#issuecomment-1015034924
If `static` objects are being destroyed while another thread is logging,
then `APRInitializer` is also destroyed (which is bad). So all logging activity
must be
swebb2066 edited a comment on pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/105#issuecomment-1015034924
If `static` objects are being destroyed while another thread is logging,
then `APRInitializer` is also destroyed (which is bad). So all logging activity
must be
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/718
Bumps
[elasticsearch-rest-high-level-client](https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch)
from 7.6.2 to 7.16.3.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/
vy merged pull request #718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/718
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/717#discussion_r786715672
##
File path:
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/impl/ThreadContextDataInjector.java
##
@@ -62,21 +62,9 @@
public stat
garydgregory commented on pull request #711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/711#issuecomment-1015376017
@ppkarwasz ping? ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
garydgregory commented on pull request #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/700#issuecomment-1015379096
This PR is indeed the cause of the build failure.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
4501 - 4600 of 7264 matches
Mail list logo