Re: [I] Reload of key/trustsore when re-establishing a connection (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
MichaelMorrisEst commented on issue #3074: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3074#issuecomment-2446349933 Hi @ppkarwasz The use case is that when a certificate expires and is replaced that the SocketAppender can continue without the need for manual intervention (curre

Re: [PR] add analytics script [logging-site]

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ayhamthemayhem commented on PR #5: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/5#issuecomment-2446351063 > Why would you skip dormant projects? At some point flume will be coming back into the fold and I won't want to remember to have to modify this. > Hey, dormant projects are n

Re: [PR] add analytics script [logging-site]

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ayhamthemayhem commented on PR #5: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/5#issuecomment-2446358385 >Could you also remove Matomo from footer.html and add a reference to your script to header.html? done ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respo

Re: [PR] add analytics script [logging-site]

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ayhamthemayhem commented on PR #5: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/5#issuecomment-2446363147 If there is a list or more info on which websites are dormant or skipped that would be great. I would adjust the PR quickly as needed :) -- This is an automated message from t

Re: [I] Broken logger initialization in 2.24.1 (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
kelunik commented on issue #3143: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3143#issuecomment-2446495388 Full reproducer: https://gist.github.com/kelunik/be51e5e2fdf746bbc86383b922bbb05e -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pl

Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients from 3.8.0 to 3.8.1 (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3142: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3142 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446421080 `private static Map normalizeProperties(Properties... propertiesList) {` returns empty map, so no relevant properties were detected I guess. ![image](https://github.com

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446448755 Ok, it seems I'm going through that code twice actually. And in the second one I'm doing code-based rebuild of configuration to configure some stuff in the code (this is for

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446450952 Sorry for false report. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446459750 Perhaps in the old version StatusLogger wasn't rebuilt. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446406034 Will try. For now this is the stack trace when I get first log line: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e37f4a26-b544-48e7-9d3c-701e8c239efb) -- Thi

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446414383 This is the config stack trace: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82929144-d56b-49fd-a05f-a9bbc9bc67a3) -- This is an automated message from the Ap

[I] Broken logger initialization in 2.24.1 (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
kelunik opened a new issue, #3143: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3143 ## Description LoggerContext / LoggerRegistry don't play well together in using weak references, which can result in a `null` logger if the GC kicks in at a bad timing. ## Configuratio

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3100: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100#issuecomment-2446579770 @morvael, > Ok, it seems I'm going through that code twice actually. And in the second one I'm doing code-based rebuild of configuration to configure some stuff in t

Re: [I] Unwanted logging by StatusLogger (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
morvael closed issue #3100: Unwanted logging by StatusLogger URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3100 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubs

Re: [I] Reload of key/trustsore when re-establishing a connection (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3074: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3074#issuecomment-2446935514 Hi @MichaelMorrisEst , > The spring boot implementation is exactly the type of functionality we are looking for. We already use this for SSL communication in our code

Re: [I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146#issuecomment-2447288575 Due to #2691 any problems with the throwable converters in `2.24.1`, will no longer apply to `2.25.0`. In the current implementation, however, there is an _off-by-one

[I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
garydgregory opened a new issue, #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146 ## Description The pattern `%xThrowable{depth}` does not work, for example, `%xThrowable{2}` and `%xThrowable{99}` both print the same stack trace, which is also the default stack trace

Re: [I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146#issuecomment-2448097451 > I would like a setting that shows me EVERYTHING, no truncations, but that's likely a feature request 😉 Isn't that the default behavior of `%throwable`? -- This i

Re: [I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
garydgregory commented on issue #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146#issuecomment-2447841678 FWIW, my expectation was that the depth counts stack FRAMES, not lines, for BOTH the exception AND its causes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

Re: [I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
garydgregory commented on issue #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146#issuecomment-2447844520 I would like a setting that shows me EVERYTHING, no truncations, but that's likely a feature request 😉 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [I] %xThrowable{depth} does not work (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
garydgregory commented on issue #3146: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3146#issuecomment-2448156834 Well, no, that's part of the confusion in the docs: "full" and "complete" corresponds to the default Java (or Log4j? ) behavior which truncates stack frames and write "2

Re: [PR] Bump site-logback.version from 1.5.11 to 1.5.12 (logging-log4j2)

2024-10-30 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3145: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3145 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio