mobilebilly opened a new pull request, #164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/164
Fix for Issue #109
This fix addresses the issue where the dotnet test command cannot recognize
the NUnit3TestAdapter in existing ItemGroup elements.
Changes Made:
Moved t
vy closed issue #81: New release supporting #64 ?
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-kotlin/issues/81
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
vy commented on issue #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-kotlin/issues/81#issuecomment-2267078826
@torfinnberset, I've drafted the release – now we need to wait for 72 hours
for [voting the
release](https://lists.apache.org/thread/y77op7zgvv0385ng84pz6c1nglvkzgrg).
--
Thi
vy commented on issue #2794:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2794#issuecomment-2267085431
@linghengqian, I am not able to reproduce the issue. When I run the
following code:
```
import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.sta
FreeAndNil commented on PR #164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/164#issuecomment-2267093575
@mobilebilly Thank you very much for your contribution.
I retargeted you pull request to Feature/111... because this is our current
development branch for 3.0.0.
Can you ple
ppkarwasz commented on issue #2791:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2791#issuecomment-2267168356
> @ppkarwasz
>
> I note from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3644 that the
`packages` property seems to be straightforward to remove, though [Migrate
l
mobilebilly commented on PR #164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/164#issuecomment-2267225104
@FreeAndNil , no problem.
The conflicts have been fixed, and my branch is now up-to-date with the
latest changes from the upstream branch Feature/111
Please review the
linghengqian commented on issue #2794:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2794#issuecomment-2267235929
- I found a more embarrassing problem, I can only use the command line to
execute the unit test of apache/hive, but I can't use IntelliJ IDEA to execute
the unit test. I
swebb2066 commented on issue #402:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/402#issuecomment-2267273281
Reopening this as it seems to still be a problem on Github CI build
machines. Unable to reproduce on AMD Ryzen 7 3750H in tens of thousands of
invocations of `asyncappendert
swebb2066 merged PR #404:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/404
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr
linghengqian commented on issue #1539:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1539#issuecomment-2267307774
# TL;DR
- I came from
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2791#issuecomment-2264663738 .
I just record GRM here because
https://github.com/oracle/graalvm
linghengqian commented on issue #2791:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2791#issuecomment-2267314532
> Hi @linghengqian,
>
> Could you point us to how you generate the GraalVM image?
>
> As almost all filters (except `DenyAllFilter` and `Filters`),
`MarkerF
12 matches
Mail list logo