Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-23 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2742541142 Hey! The error has not occurred since a memory leak was fixed in another software I use. I would therefore close the issue at this point, and would still like to thank

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-21 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM closed issue #3511: Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-05 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2701264737 > > I understand that 2.23.1+ introduced major changes, but I can't simply upgrade to Log4j 2.24.3, because the Minecraft server (or one of its plugins) depends on Log

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-05 Thread via GitHub
vy commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2701176267 > I applied the workaround by setting: `LOG4J_STATUS_ENTRIES=0` @ByteExceptionM, can you explain what do you exactly mean by applying this setting? Do you pass this as an en

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-05 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2700608924 > I understand that 2.23.1+ introduced major changes, but I can't simply upgrade to Log4j 2.24.3, because the Minecraft server (or one of its plugins) depends on Log4j **2.

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-03 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2694898695 Hey, @vy! I applied the workaround by setting: `LOG4J_STATUS_ENTRIES=0`. At first, it seemed to work fine. The server has been running for **about 8 hours

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-03 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2693672301 Hi, @vy! As you can see in the screenshots I provided, the issue isn't limited to just the **200 StatusData instances**. The memory usage is caused by an **en

Re: [I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-02 Thread via GitHub
vy commented on issue #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511#issuecomment-2692873251 @ByteExceptionM, thanks so much for the report. `StatusLogger` has gone through a significant overhaul since `2.22.1`, would you mind trying out the most recent version, i.e., `2.

[I] Possible Memory Leak in StatusLogger’s ConcurrentLinkedQueue [logging-log4j2]

2025-03-02 Thread via GitHub
ByteExceptionM opened a new issue, #3511: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3511 ## Description Log4j2's `StatusLogger$BoundedQueue` is causing a **memory leak**, where millions of `ConcurrentLinkedQueue$Node` instances are being retained, leading to extreme memory