sketchturner commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2553819330
@FreeAndNil Great. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
FreeAndNil commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2553797991
> By the way, is it by any chance possible to amend the message of the
commit that was the result of #217 completion in order to remove the
"Co-authored-by" part? Thanks
sketchturner commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2553719397
@FreeAndNil thanks. I can wait for a stable release of version 3.0.4.
By the way, is it by any chance possible to amend the message of the commit
that was the result of
garydgregory commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2553532362
> > I don't think we should keep BC outside of log4-api, but that's just me.
>
> @garydgregory log4net is monolithic, we have no separate api (as log4j).
Well
FreeAndNil commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2552897936
@sketchturner thanks.
Do you need a preview version of log4net?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
FreeAndNil commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2552895685
> I don't think we should keep BC outside of log4-api, but that's just me.
@garydgregory log4net is monolithic, we have no separate api (as log4j).
--
This is an au
garydgregory commented on issue #216:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/216#issuecomment-2552414961
I don't think we should keep BC outside of log4-api, but that's just me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
