Re: [PR] Improve reliability of reproducibility verification [logging-parent]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #406: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/406#discussion_r2133472810 ## .github/workflows/verify-reproducibility-reusable.yaml: ## @@ -61,7 +61,30 @@ jobs: with: distribution: zulu java-version: ${{

Re: [PR] Improve reliability of reproducibility verification [logging-parent]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
Copilot commented on code in PR #406: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/406#discussion_r2133469530 ## .github/workflows/verify-reproducibility-reusable.yaml: ## @@ -61,7 +61,30 @@ jobs: with: distribution: zulu java-version: ${{ in

Re: [PR] Replace Maven Cache with Mimír [logging-parent]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on PR #389: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/389#issuecomment-2951942239 In the long run I would prefer to use a solution like Mimír to ensure that we only have a single reliable cache **without** locally built artifacts that can be reused in all workfl

[PR] Improve reliability of reproducibility verification [logging-parent]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request, #406: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/406 This change introduces a separate cache specifically for the `verify-reproducibility` workflow to ensure it does not reuse artifacts cached by other workflows. By isolating its cache, we ensure

Re: [I] Script resolution depends on order of element in config file [logging-log4j2]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3336: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3336#issuecomment-2951766099 Hi @jhl221123, > I'd be grateful if you could take a look when you have a moment. Thanks! Thanks so much for your PR—and apologies for the delay in reviewing it

Re: [PR] Bump maven.version from 3.9.9 to 3.9.10 [logging-log4j-transform]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] merged PR #193: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-transform/pull/193 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: noti

[PR] Refactor StatusLogger to use precompiled Pattern constants [logging-log4j2]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
kamilkrzywanski opened a new pull request, #3719: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3719 We should improve the implementation of StatusLogger by extracting all regular expressions used for property normalization and matching into clearly named, precompiled Pattern constants

Re: [I] v3.1.0 - Exception with RollingFileAppender when files are already present (logging-log4net)

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
FreeAndNil closed issue #244: v3.1.0 - Exception with RollingFileAppender when files are already present URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/244 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL ab

Re: [I] Log file rotation writing to more than 1 file (logging-log4net)

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
FreeAndNil commented on issue #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/252#issuecomment-2949997101 @lcrok thanks for reporting the issue. "log.GetAppender(appenderName) == null" + "log.AddAppender(fileAppender)" is not thread safe. When multiple threads call your Ge

Re: [PR] Fix #244 (logging-log4net)

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
FreeAndNil merged PR #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/251 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubsc

Re: [I] Script resolution depends on order of element in config file [logging-log4j2]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
jhl221123 commented on issue #3336: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3336#issuecomment-2949633820 Hi @ppkarwasz, I came across #3176. Noticing the previous pull request had been closed, I've now opened a new PR to address this. I'd be grateful if you could

[PR] Correct script resolution order dependency [logging-log4j2]

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
jhl221123 opened a new pull request, #3718: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3718 This pull request resolves issue #3336 by fixing the script resolution failure that occurred when a `` element was placed before the `` block in a configuration file. > [!IMPORTANT]

Re: [I] v3.1.0 - Exception with RollingFileAppender when files are already present (logging-log4net)

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
eimhof commented on issue #244: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/244#issuecomment-2949158746 Thx @gdziadkiewicz, I can confirm that this fixes my issue. Looking forward to a new release. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m