swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/480
This PR addresses [this oss-fuzz
issue](https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/398049420)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
lu-xiaoshuang opened a new pull request, #3482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3482
#3442
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
github-actions[bot] merged PR #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-transform/pull/170
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: noti
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3478:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3478#issuecomment-2675012781
> Its probably OK then - was just expecting the PropertyComponentBuilder to
generate as documented.
Since XML elements can have attributes, nested elements and text c
Suvrat1629 commented on code in PR #3474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3474#discussion_r1965743880
##
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/internal/InternalLoggerRegistry.java:
##
@@ -53,23 +57,48 @@ public final class InternalLoggerR
JWT007 commented on issue #3478:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3478#issuecomment-2674860751
@ppkarwasz by the way, KeyValuePairComponentBuilder handles it differently.
```
public DefaultKeyValuePairComponentBuilder(
final DefaultConfiguration
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #3474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3474#discussion_r1965597651
##
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/internal/InternalLoggerRegistry.java:
##
@@ -53,23 +57,48 @@ public final class InternalLoggerRe
Suvrat1629 commented on PR #3474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3474#issuecomment-2674657748
Ok sorry about that, I have put back all the comment blocks as they were.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
vy commented on code in PR #3474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3474#discussion_r1965497205
##
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/internal/InternalLoggerRegistry.java:
##
@@ -39,10 +41,8 @@
/**
* A registry of {@link Logger}s name
vy commented on issue #3066:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3066#issuecomment-2674551059
Validated on 07590bc087204ccd4d091c65d0c5da255c92df68 that the installed
`~/.m2/repository/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-bom/2.25.0-SNAPSHOT/log4j-bom-2.25.0-SNAPSHOT.pom`
vy closed issue #3066: `log4j-bom` leaks non-Log4j dependencies
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3066
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3066:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3066#issuecomment-2674472130
@vy,
Should we close this one, since `logging-parent` version `12.0.0` has been
released?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3480
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
JWT007 commented on issue #3478:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3478#issuecomment-2674160547
@ppkarwasz - ahh I see now that the @PluginValue annotation
(PluginValueVisitor) first checks the value and then the attribute.
I was looking at the code and compared it
github-actions[bot] merged PR #332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/332
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications
github-actions[bot] merged PR #333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/333
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications
FreeAndNil commented on issue #227:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/227#issuecomment-2674005214
@FrankNuessle 3.0.4 is out -
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F3.0.4
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
jjohannes commented on PR #3450:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3450#issuecomment-2674028835
Here is the PR for the samples repo:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/279
Hope I did not miss anything important there.
@vy no problem. There is no u
FreeAndNil commented on PR #217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/217#issuecomment-2674002606
@sketchturner 3.0.4 is out -
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F3.0.4
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
FreeAndNil commented on issue #225:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/225#issuecomment-2674004147
@sita-martin 3.0.4 is out -
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F3.0.4
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
vy commented on PR #3450:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3450#issuecomment-2673888761
@jjohannes, I liked this proposal. Looking forward to your PR.
Note that both @ppkarwasz and I are swamped with work at the moment. Please
be patient while waiting for feedback an
22 matches
Mail list logo
