jaykataria commented on issue #2769:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2769#issuecomment-2475544830
Hi @ppkarwasz, trying to understand this statement better:
>The source code of the OpenRewrite rule should be published. If not in
OpenRewrite itself, at least
jaykataria commented on issue #2769:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2769#issuecomment-2475496860
@timtebeek, regarding this:
> @timtebeek, do you have any recommendations on how to rewrite:
>
> public static class Builder implements Supplier {
>
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3200
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
ppkarwasz commented on issue #3196:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3196#issuecomment-2474843612
@centic9,
> E.g. I am looking at it as commiter of the Apache POI library. We upgraded
log4j-api to 2.24.1 and plan to roll a release.
>
> As Apache POI is jus
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3201
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
ppkarwasz commented on PR #3201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3201#issuecomment-2474692993
@dependabot rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
ppkarwasz commented on PR #3200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3200#issuecomment-2474704204
@dependabot rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17897999#comment-17897999
]
Claudia Pastor Ramirez commented on LOG4J2-1721:
Hello,
This feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17897999#comment-17897999
]
Claudia Pastor Ramirez edited comment on LOG4J2-1721 at 11/13/24 5:24 PM:
vy commented on issue #28:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw/issues/28#issuecomment-2474092072
@tarekahf, [Chainsaw is in dormant
status](https://logging.apache.org/dormant.html), and hence, is unmaintained.
Such that, its maintainers did not bother to update the website and
ppkarwasz commented on PR #3199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3199#issuecomment-2474162178
> > `LoggerRepository#computeIfAbsent` is a new method added in `2.25.0`.
There is no BC to preserve.
>
> Isn't it released with `2.24.1`?
No, the backport of #2936
vy commented on PR #3199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3199#issuecomment-2474150260
> `LoggerRepository#computeIfAbsent` is a new method added in `2.25.0`.
There is no BC to preserve.
Isn't it released with `2.24.1`?
![image](https://github.com/user-attac
vy commented on code in PR #3199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3199#discussion_r1840646776
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/spi/LoggerRegistry.java:
##
@@ -43,7 +41,7 @@
@NullMarked
public class LoggerRegistry {
-private final Map
ppkarwasz commented on PR #3199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3199#issuecomment-2474029132
> > In order to preserve backward compatibility and allow `Logger`s to be
garbage-collected, I will:
> >
> > * [ ] Remove the new methods in `LoggerRepository` in the ori
rm5248 commented on issue #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/428#issuecomment-2473623058
There is noting currently in progress for ECS logs, as it is not a feature
that anybody has asked for.
If you are interested in trying to add it yourself, take a look at
vy commented on PR #3199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3199#issuecomment-2473998699
> In order to preserve backward compatibility and allow `Logger`s to be
garbage-collected, I will:
>
> * [ ] Remove the new methods in `LoggerRepository` in the original class.
rkay-dev commented on issue #428:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/428#issuecomment-2473675429
> There is noting currently in progress for ECS logs, as it is not a feature
that anybody has asked for.
>
> If you are interested in trying to add it yourself, take a
github-actions[bot] merged PR #3204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3204
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
github-actions[bot] merged PR #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/284
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications
ppkarwasz commented on issue #2769:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2769#issuecomment-2472799453
> > We will apply the rule as a one off operation.
>
> Yeah, so run the rule locally, and just not add dependency file changes in
the commit?
I would say that
20 matches
Mail list logo