swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/377
This PR enables a higher rate at which logging events to be sent through
AsyncAppender by avoiding some lock contention inside the `bufferNotEmpty`
[std::condition_variable](https://en.cpprefe
swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/376
This PR ensures AsyncAppender::close is called before Windows terminates the
AsyncAppender::dispatch thread
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/375
This PR adds a test (initially failing on Windows) that uses AsyncAppender
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
Chealer commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1475#issuecomment-2081189175
Thank you very much for all this information as well as for starting that
most interesting, albeit unfortunate thread @ppkarwasz . It's a shame if
renaming the artifact ident
ppkarwasz commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1475#issuecomment-2081116610
> I cannot make sense of the name "core" if it isn't for these extensions. I
guess the fundamental problem here is that the meaning of "core" is not
documented anywhere.
Chealer commented on issue #1462:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1462#issuecomment-2080890583
Thank you @ppkarwasz and @vy
The revised names and descriptions and much less misleading and clearer.
I suggested tweakings to descriptions via comments in d7917eb.
hordi commented on issue #373:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/373#issuecomment-2080848928
Yes, I have one more running thread which I can't turn off, that is
intel-TBB thread that I can't control (no API provided to completely shutdown
TBB, but no active work there d
Chealer commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1475#issuecomment-2080701907
@rgoers I am sorry for replying so late. Thank you for your reply.
> As such, I don't really see anything wrong with its name. Calling it the
"implementation core" is m
Chealer commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1475#issuecomment-2080655652
My pleasure @vy, thank you very much for this great improvement. Here is a
suggestion based on your version:
> This package contains the core of the Log4j API's referen
Chealer commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1475#issuecomment-2080597175
@rgoers this was not just about the name, but you are right about the name.
My suggestion was wrong. The name should either be left alone or removed. I
suggest to seriously c
10 matches
Mail list logo
