swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/363
This PR aims to make the release process more repeatable by using a scripted
job run by CI to generate the release files .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
FreeAndNil commented on PR #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/141#issuecomment-2040632651
@erikmav thanks for your feedback. I adjusted the files.
I'm definitely thinking about adding .net8 as target.
I had the same idea for interpolated strings (especially for th
vy closed issue #139: Enable parallel releases in reusable workflows
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/issues/139
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jvz commented on PR #1943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1943#issuecomment-2040478427
I think that's a good idea.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jvz closed pull request #1943: Create metrics API proof of concept
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1943
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
vy merged PR #2443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2443
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@lo
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1554047173
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/spi/internal/DefaultScopedContextProvider.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
jvz commented on issue #2447:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2447#issuecomment-2040314637
Does this deadlock coincide with the hourly log file rollover you
configured? I wonder if there's a race condition here between incoming log
events and the rollover process.
--
erikmav commented on code in PR #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/141#discussion_r1554000115
##
src/log4net/Core/DefaultRepositorySelector.cs:
##
@@ -755,17 +712,12 @@ private void LoadPlugins(Assembly assembly,
ILoggerRepository repository)
///
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r155402
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/ScopedContext.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
erikmav commented on PR #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/141#issuecomment-2040286940
To aid understanding - are you considering adding net8.0 as a target for the
3.0 package? I kind of like it as there are perf optimizations that can be
added like avoiding `params o
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1554003929
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/spi/internal/DefaultScopedContextProvider.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553773527
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/package-info.java:
##
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
*/
@Export
/**
- * Bumped to 2.22.0, since FormattedMessag
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553771392
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/ScopedContext.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553757235
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/spi/internal/DefaultScopedContextProvider.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553754256
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/spi/internal/DefaultScopedContextProvider.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553745339
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/ScopedContext.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553746082
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/ScopedContext.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553740141
##
log4j-api-test/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/ResourceLoggerTest.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
rgoers commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553739209
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/package-info.java:
##
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
*/
@Export
/**
- * Bumped to 2.22.0, since FormattedMessag
rgoers commented on PR #2445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2445#issuecomment-2039916880
I disagree with your premise. SimpleLogger has always supported logging the
ThreadContext. Including the ScopedContext as well makes sense since they can
be interchangeably used. Yo
tcmot commented on issue #2447:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2447#issuecomment-2039705734
I think this is a deadlock.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
FreeAndNil commented on PR #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/141#issuecomment-2039604820
@erikmav can you take a look?
- LoggingEventTest wasn't successful in CEST
- fixed more nullable Warnings when targeting net8.0 api
--
This is an automated message from th
FreeAndNil opened a new pull request, #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/141
- fixed LoggingEventTest for execution in CE(S)T or SAST
- added missing nullable attributes from net6-8
- added Log4NetAssert
- fixed more nullable Warnings when targeting net8.0
FreeAndNil opened a new pull request, #140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/140
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
clobotorre commented on issue #362:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/362#issuecomment-2039568083
Thank you so much. Solved!!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
github-actions[bot] merged PR #2446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2446
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notificatio
ppkarwasz commented on PR #1943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1943#issuecomment-2039486315
@jvz,
I think we could choose an approach similar to
[`RxJavaHooks`](https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/wiki/Plugins) to provide
instrumentation hooks **without** affecti
bharathchandrathakkallapally-cpi opened a new issue, #2447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2447
## Description
We are using the RollingFileAppender with below configuration
```
appender.file.type=RollingFile
appender.file.name=LOGFILE
appender.file.fileNa
github-actions[bot] merged PR #149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/149
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/149
Bumps
[org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-artifact-plugin](https://github.com/apache/maven-artifact-plugin)
from 3.5.0 to 3.5.1.
Commits
https://github.com/apache/maven-artifact
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2438#discussion_r1553097482
##
log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/package-info.java:
##
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
*/
@Export
/**
- * Bumped to 2.22.0, since FormattedMes
vy commented on code in PR #2443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2443#discussion_r1553190265
##
src/site/resources/.htaccess:
##
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-#
+#
Review Comment:
vy commented on code in PR #2443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2443#discussion_r1553169012
##
src/site/resources/.htaccess:
##
@@ -8,13 +7,16 @@
# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2445#issuecomment-2039157328
> I have a question though. I just noticed that you made the default
ThreadContext provider a no-op. How did that manage to pass unit tests? Why
does it need to be a no-op. For o
35 matches
Mail list logo