Re: [I] Log4j incompatible with recent kubernetes-client (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #2151: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2151#issuecomment-1874962737 @Amya28, thank you for the issue report. Currently `log4j-kubernetes` is compiled against version 5.12.4: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/846997

Re: [PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.24.2 to 3.25.0 [logging-log4j-tools]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #96: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/pull/96#issuecomment-1874951304 Superseded by #97. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spe

Re: [PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.24.2 to 3.25.0 [logging-log4j-tools]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #96: Bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.24.2 to 3.25.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/pull/96 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

[PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.24.2 to 3.25.1 [logging-log4j-tools]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #97: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/pull/97 Bumps [org.assertj:assertj-core](https://github.com/assertj/assertj) from 3.24.2 to 3.25.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases";>org.assert

Re: [I] Log4j incompatible with recent kubernetes-client (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
Amya28 commented on issue #2151: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2151#issuecomment-1874907608 https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/rel/2.22.1/log4j-kubernetes/pom.xml This doesnot specify the kubernetes-client version hence, it is fetching to the late

[I] Log4j incompatible with recent kubernetes-client (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
Amya28 opened a new issue, #2151: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2151 ## Description While using the latest log4j release version ; we encountered the following error : ERROR StatusConsoleListener Unable to create Lookup for k8s java.lang.NoSuchMethodErro

Re: [PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-bom from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1 [logging-log4j-samples]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #104: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/104#issuecomment-1874731552 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor

Re: [PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-bom from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1 [logging-log4j-samples]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #104: Bump org.assertj:assertj-bom from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/104 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-bom from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1 [logging-log4j-samples]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #104: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/104#issuecomment-1874731522 Changes are applied by CI in ed2d4e9751e05fb4daa1181d183a7bfd8b660a5f -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, ple

[PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-bom from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1 [logging-log4j-samples]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #104: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/104 Bumps [org.assertj:assertj-bom](https://github.com/assertj/assertj) from 3.25.0 to 3.25.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases";>org.ass

Re: [I] Add record support for @Plugin annotation (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on issue #2026: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2026#issuecomment-1874706669 This seems to work fine already in 3.0.0-beta1, though the annotations have changed a little. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

Re: [I] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on issue #2147: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2147#issuecomment-1874666271 Completed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. T

Re: [I] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz closed issue #2147: Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2147 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comme

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz merged PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@l

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439715992 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/TestBinding.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439715122 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/LoggingResolvers.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439712246 ## src/site/_release-notes/_3.x.x.adoc: ## @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ This release contains... +[#release-notes-3-x-x-added] +=== Added + +* Add various DSLs for depend

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439712072 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/TestBindings.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#issuecomment-1874260312 The "late" DI changes are being made now based because I wasn't trying to indefinitely delay pre-3.0.0 releases. In the lead up to 2.0.0, we accepted API changes up until 2.0.0 was cut

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439618118 ## src/changelog/.3.x.x/2147_add_instance_factory_dsls.xml: ## @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + +http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; + xmlns="http://logging.apache.o

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439617754 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/Log4jExtension.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
jvz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439616924 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/Log4jExtension.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio

Re: [I] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/ has a broken link (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #2149: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2149#issuecomment-1874230201 @ghueller, thanks for the report. @temple69, thanks for volunteering help. I believe that many links on that page should be checked. -- This is an automated messag

Re: [I] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/ has a broken link (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
temple69 commented on issue #2149: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2149#issuecomment-1874221444 I would like to work on this issue -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[PR] Sync `log4j-to-jul` between 2.x and 3.x branch (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request, #2150: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2150 This PR adds to the `log4j-to-jul` module the missing changes from the 2.x branch. Regarding the `log4j-to-jul` module, the only differences between the 2.x and 3.x version is the abse

[I] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/ has a broken link (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ghueller opened a new issue, #2149: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2149 ## Description Page contains paragraph: [Where are the release notes?](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/release-notes.adoc) however, the real link should be https://logging.apache.org

Re: [I] [MS7] Unified memory management #2 (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on issue #2016: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2016#issuecomment-1873896862 I am currently working on: - `log4j-script`, - `log4j-slf4j-impl`, - `log4j-slf4j2-impl`, - `log4j-to-jul` so I marked them as done to prevent collisio

Re: [I] Add JSpecify annotations to defaults [logging-parent]

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
GregDThomas commented on issue #88: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/issues/88#issuecomment-1873829630 > which tools currently support those annotations? I am mostly interested in Eclipse, IDEA, Spotbugs and some tool like NullAway or Checker Framework t IntelliJ supports

Re: [PR] Update DI system with DSL for configuring bindings (logging-log4j2)

2024-01-02 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2148: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2148#discussion_r1439261370 ## log4j-core-test/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/test/junit/Log4jExtension.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou