[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski updated LOG4J2-2977:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Documentation for code to create a FileAppender is out of date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17255330#comment-17255330
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4J2-2977:
---
Looks like the simplest fix would be to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski reassigned LOG4J2-2977:
-
Assignee: Ron Grabowski
> Documentation for code to create a FileAppender is out of dat
rm5248 merged pull request #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/46
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17255319#comment-17255319
]
Marcono1234 edited comment on LOG4J2-2982 at 12/27/20, 8:53 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17255319#comment-17255319
]
Marcono1234 edited comment on LOG4J2-2982 at 12/27/20, 8:53 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17255319#comment-17255319
]
Marcono1234 commented on LOG4J2-2982:
-
Sorry, when I locally built Log4j2 I saw that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17255316#comment-17255316
]
Samuel Martin commented on LOG4J2-2984:
---
I have updated the issue (and the title)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samuel Martin updated LOG4J2-2984:
--
Description:
According to the documentation, Filters can be applied in different places:
amon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samuel Martin updated LOG4J2-2984:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0
2.0.1
2.0.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samuel Martin updated LOG4J2-2984:
--
Description:
According to the documentation, Filters can be applied in different places:
amon
Samuel Martin created LOG4J2-2984:
-
Summary: Filters are not applied to loggers
Key: LOG4J2-2984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2984
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Bug
Marcono1234 edited a comment on pull request #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/451#issuecomment-751490879
> and you can say that any method is 'not type-safe' if it is declared in
the patten ` T foo()`.
And I will say this 😄
Though to clarify, the issue I am
Marcono1234 commented on pull request #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/451#issuecomment-751490879
> and you can say that any method is 'not type-safe' if it is declared in
the patten ` T foo()`.
And I will say this 😄
Though to clarify, the issue I am having
rm5248 commented on a change in pull request #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/46#discussion_r549130252
##
File path: src/main/include/log4cxx/net/syslogappender.h
##
@@ -136,6 +148,16 @@ class LOG4CXX_EXPORT SyslogAppender : public
AppenderSkeleton
garydgregory commented on pull request #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/451#issuecomment-751484571
IMO I'm not sure it's worth mentioning because this is actually a Java
feature and can you can say that any method is 'not type-safe' if it is
declared in the patten `
Marcono1234 commented on pull request #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/451#issuecomment-751478321
Hm, yes you are right. Do you think this might be acceptable, or is that not
worth it?
I have
[commented](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1418?focus
ams-tschoening commented on a change in pull request #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/46#discussion_r549115000
##
File path: src/main/include/log4cxx/net/syslogappender.h
##
@@ -136,6 +148,16 @@ class LOG4CXX_EXPORT SyslogAppender : public
AppenderSkele
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tapan Ray updated LOG4J2-2983:
--
Description:
Hi.
I tried CrontriggeringPolicy(added 2.14.0 version) for rolling daily log files
at m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tapan Ray updated LOG4J2-2983:
--
Description:
Hi.
I tried CrontriggeringPolicy(added 2.14.0 version) for rolling daily log files
at m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tapan Ray updated LOG4J2-2983:
--
Description:
Hi.
I tried CrontriggeringPolicy(added 2.14.0 version) for rolling daily log files
at m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tapan Ray updated LOG4J2-2983:
--
Description:
Hi.
I tried CrontriggeringPolicy(added 2.14.0 version) for rolling daily log files
at m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tapan Ray updated LOG4J2-2983:
--
Summary: evaluateOnStartUp with CronTriggeringPolicy file renaming behavior
at midnight on service res
Tapan Ray created LOG4J2-2983:
-
Summary: evaluateOnStartUp with CronTriggeringPolicy file renaming
behavior at midnight
Key: LOG4J2-2983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2983
Project: Log
24 matches
Mail list logo
