[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147197#comment-17147197
]
Hash Jang commented on LOG4J2-2880:
---
Well, I hope you can eliminate the Stackwalker un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147195#comment-17147195
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-2880:
-
OK. If you believe this matches the JDK bug w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147185#comment-17147185
]
Hash Jang edited comment on LOG4J2-2880 at 6/28/20, 3:38 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147185#comment-17147185
]
Hash Jang commented on LOG4J2-2880:
---
By the way, there are four reactor-http-epoll- th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147174#comment-17147174
]
Hash Jang commented on LOG4J2-2880:
---
Thanks for the response. But I think we are not f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hash Jang updated LOG4J2-2880:
--
Attachment: log4j2.xml
> High CPU consumption using StackWalker
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147165#comment-17147165
]
Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-2880 at 6/28/20, 3:08 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147165#comment-17147165
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-2880:
-
There is not enough information here to be ab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hash Jang updated LOG4J2-2880:
--
Description:
While using OpenJDK 11, there are possibility cause severe CPU consumption
because of JD
Hash Jang created LOG4J2-2880:
-
Summary: High CPU consumption using StackWalker
Key: LOG4J2-2880
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2880
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Bug
rgoers edited a comment on pull request #366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/366#issuecomment-650652949
That is true, but it seems odd to add the StackTraceElement to things like
traceEntry & traceExit and then ALSO add them to Messages. The location
information isn't l
rgoers commented on pull request #366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/366#issuecomment-650652949
That is true, but it seems odd to add the StackTraceElement to things like
traceEntry & traceExit and then ALSO add them to Messages. The location
information isn't logicall
garydgregory commented on pull request #366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/366#issuecomment-650650605
The breaking could be less using default methods FWIW...
This is an automated message from the Apache
rgoers commented on pull request #366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/366#issuecomment-650650281
This change is modifying the signatures of virtually all the Messages, which
will break some existing users. What's more, clients who want to set the source
manually already
shawjef3 opened a new pull request #366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/366
The purpose of this is to make it possible to improve performance. Getting
the StackTraceElement for a message is somewhat expensive. Creating it manually
is tedious and no one should do it, but
15 matches
Mail list logo