stephen-webb opened a new pull request #14: Replace ant build with cmake
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/14
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
remkop commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580583586
@vy Understood. That makes sense to me.
This is an automated message
vy commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580267355
> Not sure I agree... What is the trade-off? What do users gain when they
select something other than ThreadLocal?
If you'd recall,
remkop commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580261245
Not sure I agree... What is the trade-off? What do users gain when they
select something other than ThreadLocal?
vy commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580240386
Triggered by @richardstartin's observation, why don't we allow all 3
co-exist in the code base? After all, the call site doesn't care abou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kemper closed LOG4J2-2755.
Resolution: Invalid
Found the issue in an invalid configuration.
The incorrect Json Strin
richardstartin commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as
JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580229964
> I don’t think we’re measuring the cost of GC anywhere, are we?
At this scale, there are so many confounding factors w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17026627#comment-17026627
]
Ronan Lanigan commented on LOG4J2-1973:
---
I've run into this same issue with 2.13.0
remkop commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580215790
> I would be interested to know the marginal cost of G1 in this case. The
most interesting metric is MPMC/G1 vs MPMC/other GC
I
remkop commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580205695
Well, what is the trade off? What benefits do we gain in return of this
worse performance?
--
vy commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580197240
And the following question still stands open: Given TLA results constitute
the baseline, what is the pool implied maximum performance degr
richardstartin commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as
JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580196090
To be clear, that’s just a hunch. I haven’t run the benchmarks let alone
profiled them.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Heiko Schwanke reopened LOG4J2-2457:
The patch creates files with .gz extension after reconfiguration, but they are
not compressed
vy edited a comment on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as
JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580189684
> The NoOp benchmark should be renamed Allocate
Check.
> I don't believe that `MpmcArrayQueue` is lock-free
Th
vy commented on issue #335: Import of LogstashLayout as JsonTemplateLayout
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/335#issuecomment-580189684
> The NoOp benchmark should be renamed Allocate
Check.
> I don't believe that `MpmcArrayQueue` is lock-free
The defini
15 matches
Mail list logo