roxy_ignore_headers "Cache-Control"; and "expires
30d;" will remove the header from the response and write the corresponding
"Cache-Control" and "Expires" with the 30d.
Or do I have to do this:
browser ->
nginx, caches and if necessary requests new tile via -&
step one: check cache, if the resource is expired
or not cached, nginx calls itself to get the resource.
Step two: call upstream and modify the expires
header to 30d. Return response to the cache.
Cache is now happy with an expires 30d header :-)
Kind regard
Kaushal,
If you look at the image
https://www.nginx.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/branch.png
I personally would only use the mainline version. If a fix was a hidden
security vulnerability and it is not a major bug fix it wont get into
stable.
Best,
Manuel
Am Do., 24. Sept. 2020 um 16:47 Uhr
Hi,
do you forward all headers the browser sends to the server?
The chrome version is very old.
You need to pretend that you are the browser.
Kind regards,
Manuel
> Am 03.02.2023 um 08:54 schrieb Lukas Tribus :
>
>
> On Friday, 3 February 2023, Saint Michael wrote:
>>
:)
>>>>
>>>> As it stands… you are not going to win this one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:57 AM Saint Michael wrote:
>>>>> I am sure that it can be done. I am just passing everything to them.
>>
Hello,
thank you for all the work for njs.
We will probably use it in one of our next projects.
Regarding the example
> let body = async reply.text();
should it be const body = await reply.next(); ?
Kind regards,
Manuel
> Am 13.09.2023 um 01:10 schrieb Dmitry Volyntsev :
>
Do you run the latest nginx version?
Any obscure modules / extensions?
Kind regards,
Manuel
> Am 20.09.2023 um 18:56 schrieb Lance Dockins :
>
>
> Are there any best practices or processes for debugging sudden memory spikes
> in Nginx on production servers? We have a few ve
Good Evening Maxim,
thank you for the work.
I am speechless. My personal opinion:
@F5 get an advisor for open source
and maybe read something about enshittification m(
TT
Will follow freenginx then.
Thx.
> Am 14.02.2024 um 18:59 schrieb Maxim Dounin :
>
> Hello!
>
> As you probably know, F
Hi Ian,
simply combine your basic auth with
==
auth_basic "";
auth_basic_user_file ;
satisfy any;
allow 127.0.0.1;
allow ::1;
deny all;
==
Regards,
Manu
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hi,
I currently run a small system which consists on an Apache HTTP with PHP (8080)
backend (no SSL on localhost) with a Varnish HTTP accelerator on Port 9000
(localhost) and a NGINX reverse proxy (SSL).
I am facing a small issue with this setup, mainly, when I select checkboxes and
friends a
this is the analysis results link:
http://live.clinkerhq.com/sonar/dashboard/index/3656
So, NGINX has a eye over his code now :-)
Cheers,
Antonio.
--
Antonio Manuel Muñiz Martín
Software Developer at klicap - ingeniería del puzle
work phone + 34 954 894 322
www.klicap.es | blog.klic
11 matches
Mail list logo