Hi
I've used NGINX module's auth_http directive to great success with SMTP,
IMAP and POP3. In particular the service I'm pointing to by NGINX's
auth_http enables me to route mail connections differently based on the
authenticated user or whoever the mail is addressed to.
Going by the NGINX docume
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:37 PM Thomas Ward wrote:
>
> Jeffrey,
>
> If I read OP's information right, the test they were seeing was that it says
> it needs SNI support and a number of browsers showed "No SNI support". I
> know from testing OpenResty supports
Jeffrey,
If I read OP's information right, the test they were seeing was that it says it
needs SNI support and a number of browsers showed "No SNI support". I know
from testing OpenResty supports SNI. That isn't the issue here I believe.
Sent from my Galaxy
-
correct cert
> for each domain.
The real fix needs to be made in openrusty. SNI is a standard
extension. its about time openrusty properly support it.
Another way to fix it is, find a CA to issue a certificate that
includes all the domains in the Subject Alt Name. So the end entity
certificate is
From: Saint Michael
Date: 3/11/24 02:34 (GMT-05:00)
To: nginx@nginx.org
Subject: No SNI support on multisite installation
I have an openresty server, latest, compiled with http_ssl. So I have
5 websites on the same IP, each one with a server block, a listen
statement :443 SSL; and its
/ssltest/ says that there is no SNI support,
"This site works only in browsers with SNI support."
" Certificate #2: RSA 2048 bits (SHA256withRSA) No SNI
Server Key and Certificate #1
Subjectssnode1.minixel.com
Fingerprint SHA256:
2c43df752c9f32a0b9072c9918c7f4064f215a75f321a3eed54f3
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:05:51 +0530
Akash Shrivastava wrote:
> Hi there,
> Urgent support needed on Nginx-ingress 3.4.0
I'd recommend posting ingress controller related questions on the
discussions section of it's Github repo.
https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ing
Hi there,
Urgent support needed on Nginx-ingress 3.4.0
https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/pull/4428
What does this mean?
What consideration needs to be taken before uploading this version?
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https
Hi Shashi Kant Sharma.
On 2023-09-04 (Mo.) 10:33, Shashi Kant Sharma wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your email however I know Nginx plus support there and no
support for Nginx. We are stuck in one issue at client side and on prem
environment as unable to upload more than 20 mb.
Have you
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your email however I know Nginx plus support there and no support
for Nginx. We are stuck in one issue at client side and on prem environment as
unable to upload more than 20 mb.
It would be highly appreciable if quick connect on team and it will not take
more than 20
You accepted when you installed it, no one is your support, but if you ask
nicely and stop with the FN demands, you may get a little help, as this
nice person did.
This is not what this type of software is about, and its your bad for not
understanding. This is not only for you, but would like it
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:05:37AM -0400, Saint Michael wrote:
Hi there,
> The question is: if this is a full reverse proxy, and all requests come
> from my NGINX server,
I suspect that the answer is "they don't".
Dailymotion seems to be a video hosting site with a business model based
around a
Shashi, et. al:
This is the nginx oss community lists. There is no dedicated support SLA here,
nor is there a "can we get together for a call or discussion".
Maxim indicated there would be an off-list reply to you. There is no need to
continue emailing the public mailing list aski
Subject: RE: Nginx Support required
THIS EMAIL IS FROM AN EXTERNAL SOURCE, Internet Links, office documents or
other attachments may contain viruses/malware. Do not click on a link open or
enable any file unless you trust the sender.
Hi Maxim/Team,
I am looking forward response on this. Can yo
Does anybody have any idea what am I doing wrong?
On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 4:42 PM Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi Michael.
>
> On 2023-09-02 (Sa.) 19:01, Saint Michael wrote:
> > Is there any paid support that would help me fix this problem:
>
> You searched for this site
&g
Hi Michael.
On 2023-09-02 (Sa.) 19:01, Saint Michael wrote:
Is there any paid support that would help me fix this problem:
You searched for this site
https://www.nginx.com/products/nginx/compare-models/
nginx offers via nginx plus a product with support and more as you can
see in the page
Is there any paid support that would help me fix this problem:
This works:
https://www.ntn24.com/noticias-actualidad/crecen-las-hipotesis-alrededor-de-la-muerte-del-exjefe-del-grupo-wagner-yevgueni-prigozhin-439911
but in the link below, the video from videomotion, fails to play:
https
Is there any paid support that would help me fix this problem:
This works:
https://www.ntn24.com/noticias-actualidad/crecen-las-hipotesis-alrededor-de-la-muerte-del-exjefe-del-grupo-wagner-yevgueni-prigozhin-439911
but in the link below, the video from videomotion, fails to play:
https
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:01:42AM +, Shashi Kant Sharma wrote:
Hi there,
> I am looking forward response on this. Can you please response or suggest any
> time for discussion today.
For the nginx@nginx.org public list for "community" support of the open
source application:
m; Sapna Sharma ; Arvind
Dhamija ; Suvidha Raizada
; Bhupendra Singh
Subject: RE: Nginx Support required
HI Maxim,
Many thanks for response however please find hosted environment details and
looking forward your support as it will not take more than 20 minutes time.
In Espire environment we a
HI Maxim,
Many thanks for response however please find hosted environment details and
looking forward your support as it will not take more than 20 minutes time.
In Espire environment we are using below config:-
Espire UAT environment.
OS - Ubuntu - 18.0
Nginx version - 1.18
Client
Hi Maxim,
Can you loop any relevant team who can assist and provide the support?
Regards
Shashi Kant Sharma
Associate Director - IT
Espire Infolabs Pvt. Ltd.
486 & 487, Udyog Vihar Phase-III Gurugram 122016
m +91 9910777529 t +91 124 3843 101
Email shashi.sha...@espire.com Skype
1, 2023 12:11 PM
*To:* nginx@nginx.org
*Cc:* Arvind Dhamija ; Suvidha Raizada
*Subject:* RE: Nginx Support required
Hello Team,
Any update on this?
Regards
**
**
**
*Shashi Kant Sharma*
Associate Director - IT
Espire Infolabs Pvt. Ltd.
486 & 487, Udyog Vihar Phase-III G
Subject: RE: Nginx Support required
Hello Team,
Any update on this?
Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01D9DCED.1FF85AB0]
Shashi Kant Sharma
Associate Director - IT
Espire Infolabs Pvt. Ltd.
486 & 487, Udyog Vihar Phase-III Gurugram 122016
m +91 9910777529 t +91 124 3843 101
Email shashi
Thanks for your suggestion, I'll try another way.
---
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:18:44AM +0800, l...@cndns.com wrote:
>
>> I want the response to support ssl, is there a way to achieve it? HTTP/1.0
>> 200 OK Auth-Status: OK Auth-Server: 19
Hello!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:18:44AM +0800, l...@cndns.com wrote:
> I want the response to support ssl, is there a way to achieve it?
>
> HTTP/1.0 200 OK
>
> Auth-Status: OK
>
> Auth-Server: 198.51.100.1
>
> Auth-Port: 143
>
> add parameter Auth-
I want the response to support ssl, is there a way to achieve it?
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Auth-Status: OK
Auth-Server: 198.51.100.1
Auth-Port: 143
add parameter Auth-Ssl: on ?
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https://mailman.nginx.org
Hi All,
we tried to install an updated module for the SSL fingerprint in Nginx
https://github.com/salesforce/ja3 but some modules like
https://github.com/phuslu/nginx-ssl-fingerprint aren't compatible with
OpenSSL 3.
Could you help us if it's possible to configure this fingerprint
implementation?
On May 19, 2023 at 8:01 PM -0500, Maxim Dounin , wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:57:04PM -0500, Dustin Marquess wrote:
>
> > I noticed that QUIC Stream and QUIC Server Push support were
> > removed in
> >
> > https://hg.nginx.org/nginx-quic/rev/11
Hello!
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:57:04PM -0500, Dustin Marquess wrote:
> I noticed that QUIC Stream and QUIC Server Push support were
> removed in
>
> https://hg.nginx.org/nginx-quic/rev/113e2438dbd4
>
> And
>
> https://hg.nginx.org/nginx-quic/rev/f742b1b46901
>
I noticed that QUIC Stream and QUIC Server Push support were removed in
https://hg.nginx.org/nginx-quic/rev/113e2438dbd4
And
https://hg.nginx.org/nginx-quic/rev/f742b1b46901
I'm curious on what the reasoning was, given that none was given in the commit
messages?
-D
erver OS, I will be installing Ubuntu Advantage to extend the EOL to
> 2028 however I realise third party repos like yourself may have different
> plans.
>
> How long will nginx.org continue to release security updates for Ubuntu 18?
Linux packages are generally updated until the end
Hello!
I am using the NGINX stable release from the nginx.org repo on a number
of Ubuntu 18 servers and I am making a plan for when these servers reach
end of life next year.
For the server OS, I will be installing Ubuntu Advantage to extend the
EOL to 2028 however I realise third party re
i'm running nginx/1.23.1
i use 'geo'-based (ngx_http_geo_module) permissions to restrict access to some
sites
e.g., for explicit static IPs
geo $RESTRICT_ACCESS {
default 0;
127.0.0.1/32 1;
2601:...:abcd1;
}
Hello
Thank you to everyone who answered.
I came to understand that RFC 8673 is an experimental feature and is
not in the feature support plan.
Thank you for your answer again.
2022년 7월 12일 (화) 오후 7:31, Maxim Dounin 님이 작성:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:00:32PM +090
> 2. If the operation of RFC 8673 is not supported, I would like to know if
> there is a future support plan.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
As of now, no RFC 8673 experimental features are supported by
nginx. No support is currently planned.
As long as relevant features are HTTP-co
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt 8673 an experimental protocol and not a
standard, as that rfc even says in its text? If so, then I doubt support for
this is likely to land in nginx.
Sent from my Galaxy
Original message
From: 박규철
Date: 7/12/22 04:02 (GMT-05:0
lice module, but I think it is
insufficient to implement the "low latency" of RFC 8673.
1. I want to know if the operation of RFC 8673 is supported in the
released nginx.
2. If the operation of RFC 8673 is not supported, I would like to know if
there is a future support plan.
Any help
Hello,
I want to add support for an ssl_engine + ssl_certificate/key directives in
the nignx.conf that configures an nginx server for ingress on kubernetes.
This functionality is not provided by default, and I read that Snippets may
be the recommended way to add such support.
Could you please
Hi,
hope you're doing well.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 01:37:48PM +, Mithilesh Wachasunder (mwachasu) via
nginx wrote:
>
> Had a question, is nginx-1.14.2 declared as EOL(End of Life)?
Well, the support can be discussible.
Is there any specic usecase to support so legacy version?
From: "Mithilesh Wachasunder (mwachasu) via nginx"
Date: 6/20/22 09:38 (GMT-05:00)
To: nginx@nginx.org
Cc: "Mithilesh Wachasunder (mwachasu)"
Subject: Support for nginx-1.14.2
Hello team
Had a question, is nginx-1.14.2 declared as EOL(End of Life)?
Hello team
Had a question, is nginx-1.14.2 declared as EOL(End of Life)?
Thank you
Mithilesh
___
nginx mailing list -- nginx@nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-le...@nginx.org
You can choose PCRE or PCRE2 and build-nginx will do the right thing
https://jay.gooby.org/2022/06/16/support-pcre2-or-pcre-in-build-nginx
https://github.com/jaygooby/build-nginx
--
Jay Caines-Gooby
http://jay.gooby.org
j...@gooby.org
___
nginx mailing
Hi there,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:09:09PM -0500, graphite_123 wrote:
> OS: Linux, distribution: Debian (buster)
>
> Currently, we using nginx:1.14.2, and to support Lua we are using
> libnginx-mod-http-lua:1.14.2 package.
>
> We are working on upgrading Nginx to nginx:1.21.
- but actual
other module dependencies to be compiled in to make things work proper)
Sent from my Galaxy
Original message
From: graphite_123
Date: 1/3/22 17:09 (GMT-05:00)
To: nginx@nginx.org
Subject: How to add lua support into latest nginx version
OS: Linux, distribution
OS: Linux, distribution: Debian (buster)
Currently, we using nginx:1.14.2, and to support Lua we are using
libnginx-mod-http-lua:1.14.2 package.
We are working on upgrading Nginx to nginx:1.21.0 version, but I'm unable to
find the compatible libnginx-mod-http-lua package. Can someone please
, Reinis Rozitis пишет:
As some of you probably know we added kTLS support in nginx-1.21.4.
Before testing myself wanted to quickly clarify - does this work in
combination with older cipher suites (as in fallback from kTLS to standard
non-kernel) to support older clients which still use tls 1.1 / 1.2
> As some of you probably know we added kTLS support in nginx-1.21.4.
Before testing myself wanted to quickly clarify - does this work in
combination with older cipher suites (as in fallback from kTLS to standard
non-kernel) to support older clients which still use tls 1.1 / 1.2 or you
are loc
Hello,
As some of you probably know we added kTLS support in nginx-1.21.4.
We also published a blog post that provides more information about how
it works and how to enable it in nginx:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/improving-nginx-performance-with-kernel-tls/
Additional reading:
Drew
Hi,
Does nginx have an official captive portal feature? Or does nginx support a
specific captive portal setup?
Many thanks,
https://apksprofree.com/
Lucky Prince
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,292500,292500#msg-292500
Hi,
Does nginx have an official captive portal feature? Or does nginx support a
specific captive portal setup?
Many thanks,
Shaam
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 01:47:44PM -0400, bouvierh wrote:
Hi there,
> I have looked at it, however it looks like this is intended to make proxy
> transparent from upstream/backend perspective:
> It is used so upstream server can see client address not proxy address.
>
> I am looking to do the op
Thanks for the reply!
I have looked at it, however it looks like this is intended to make proxy
transparent from upstream/backend perspective:
It is used so upstream server can see client address not proxy address.
I am looking to do the opposite, I would like to make proxy transparent from
the
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:36:47AM -0400, bouvierh wrote:
Hi there,
I don't have a tested answer to your question, but...
> When my application connects to a sever, I am intercepting the request and
> routing it to a nginx process located on the same host (listening to
> 127.0.0.1:8883).
> The i
Hello,
When my application connects to a sever, I am intercepting the request and
routing it to a nginx process located on the same host (listening to
127.0.0.1:8883).
The interception need to be transparent, so IP tables does that well. Now
the issue is restoring the original destination. This wo
Hi,
Can somebody show the minimal configuration to suppport large file upload
with multipart/form-data Content-Type?
When I upload 8GB file with the following global configs, I will always get
600s timeout with the error: upstream timed out (110: Connection timed out)
while reading response header
Currently, on Ubuntu20.10, I've compiled the latest git master version
of FFmpeg with the native TLS/SSL support through the following
configuration option:
$ ./configure --enable-openssl
$ ffmpeg -protocols |& egrep -i 'in|out|rtmps'
Input:
rtmps
Output:
rtmps
At this mo
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:04:03PM +0200, FlashBlog wrote:
Hi there,
> i need to configure reverse proxy for an iptv list, can anyone help me?
The usual way is to "proxy_pass" within a "location" that you want to
handle the request.
http://nginx.org/r/proxy_pass
http://nginx.org/r/location
Do
i need to configure reverse proxy for an iptv list, can anyone help me?
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
does that mean 1.14.2 is End of Support ?
> Will there be any patches provided to this version if any major
> issues are found ?
> In general do you suggest installing any version of Nginx on
> Debian 10 which is not part of Debian 10 repository ? If yes, do
> we need to be aware
Hi,
We noticed that on Debian 10 the default Nginx version is 1.14.2-2+deb10u3.
However on your website (http://nginx.org/en/download.html) Nginx 1.14.2 is
deemed as a "Legacy Version". So does that mean 1.14.2 is End of Support ?
Will there be any patches provided to this version if
Dear NGINX maintainer:
Will nginx support quic-lb feature which was described in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-03 latter? We
firmly believe that nginx is the most appropriate LB product to do this(Other
LB product such as LVS, have to modify kernel). If you
with SNI
> support.
>
> I'd like to route traffic from example.com on ports 587 & 143 to one
> container and traffic for acme.com on ports 587 & 143 to a different
> container, etc.
Does the first example configuration at
http://nginx.org/en/docs/stream/ngx_stream_
u use WebAssembly in nginx.
1) do you have publicly available code right now?
2) Do you support any interoperability interfaces like proxy-wasm?
(https://github.com/proxy-wasm/spec/tree/master/abi-versions/vNEXT)
Or please share the details about your WASM runtime, and the way you
interact with nginx inte
HiWebAssembly provides a new way to extend the module, like envoy already
supports WebAssembly. we would like to consult nginx's attitude towards this
In addition, We have supported WebAssembly for Nignx. we can load the wasm
module as your extension like Lua. Will you consider accepting our code
Hello,
I have a single server with one Public IP and 10 domains. For each domain
I’d like to have a separate docker container as an email server (Postfix +
Dovecot). I’d like to achieve this with transparent TCP proxy with SNI
support.
I'd like to route traffic from example.com on port
Once upon a time, Svyatoslav Mishyn said:
> (Tue, 07 Jul 11:05) Chris Adams:
> > No, not postfix - it doesn't support SNI on the server side (and postfix
> > maintainers are not interested in adding support).
>
> FYI, it has SNI support but version should be >= 3.4,
(Tue, 07 Jul 11:05) Chris Adams:
> No, not postfix - it doesn't support SNI on the server side (and postfix
> maintainers are not interested in adding support).
FYI, it has SNI support but version should be >= 3.4, see:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_server_sni_ma
Once upon a time, Denis Sh. said:
> So, Chris, you're saying that you successfully run Postfix and Dovecot that
> rely on SNI in production?
No, not postfix - it doesn't support SNI on the server side (and postfix
maintainers are not interested in adding support). I do have D
to each
> other over public internet using it.
> I would not say it's a local only protocol, It's not LMTP.
>
> Also, XCLIENT is an extension, not the standard way of doing
> AUTH, correct me if I'm wrong here.
>
> I'm still curious why NGINX choose not to
ut local or dedicated SMTP
server?
SMTP is used to send mail and also mail servers talk to each other over public
internet using it.
I would not say it's a local only protocol, It's not LMTP.
Also, XCLIENT is an extension, not the standard way of doing AUTH, correct me
if I'm
via SNI in
> >> SMTPS and IMAPS connections
>
> I'm afraid I need to support STARTTLS and either completely do AUTH on NGINX
> or backends.
So stream certainly won't work for you. The question is still the
same though: what are you trying to achieve.
> Also, I
Yeah, It's 2020 after all :)
I think most modern mail client do support SNI and send server name in client
hello.
So, Chris, you're saying that you successfully run Postfix and Dovecot that
rely on SNI in production?
How bit is your user base, roughly?
Thanks
06.07.2020, 11:21, &q
le to find a reason why NGINX intentionally doesn't
>> support passing thru the AUTH to the backend for SMTP, same as with IMAP/POP?
>
> I looked at adding this, using ID for IMAP and XCLIENT for POP3 (what
> Dovecot supports)... didn't get the time and don't need it
Once upon a time, Denis Sh. said:
> Also, I wasn't able to find a reason why NGINX intentionally doesn't support
> passing thru the AUTH to the backend for SMTP, same as with IMAP/POP?
I looked at adding this, using ID for IMAP and XCLIENT for POP3 (what
Dovecot supports)..
Once upon a time, Maxim Dounin said:
> Note though that in general there is no concept of name-based
> virtual hosts in mail protocols, and using name-based virtual
> hosts for SSL might not be a good idea either. Also, status of
> SNI support by email clients varies, and "
is to provide
>> different certificates to different names requested via SNI in
>> SMTPS and IMAPS connections
I'm afraid I need to support STARTTLS and either completely do AUTH on NGINX
or backends.
Also, I wasn't able to find a reason why NGINX intentionally doesn
ifferent names requested via SNI in> SMTPS and IMAPS connections I'm afraid I need to support STARTTLS and either completely do AUTH on NGINX or backends. Also, I wasn't able to find a reason why NGINX intentionally doesn't support passing thru the AUTH to the backend for SMTP, same as
I in
SMTPS and IMAPS connections, proxying via the stream module with
ssl_preread (http://nginx.org/r/ssl_preread) might work for you.
Note though that in general there is no concept of name-based
virtual hosts in mail protocols, and using name-based virtual
hosts for SSL might not be a good id
Hi!
So, when proxying SMTP/IMAP, is it possible to get the Server Name that mail
clients send as a part of Client Hello?
Similar to Embedded Variables for ngx_http_ssl_module:
$ssl_server_name
returns the server name requested through SNI (1.7.0);
I don't see these vars defined here
https://gi
Hi! So, when proxying SMTP/IMAP, is it possible to get the Server Name that mail clients send as a part of Client Hello? Similar to Embedded Variables for ngx_http_ssl_module:$ssl_server_namereturns the server name requested through SNI (1.7.0); Or should I use `stream` to proxy mail? What about ST
> Following the "adding module ..." line, nginx configure calls the
> "config" script from the module directory. And since there is no
> further output, it hangs somewhere in the config script of the
> passenger module.
You're right, I spend a good part of the day to track this down and figured
ou
Hello!
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:33:35AM -0400, svoop wrote:
> I'm using Nginx on a Gentoo Linux box to serve Ruby apps with Passenger for
> years now and up to this point, never any real trouble compiling Nginx.
>
> Today, however, trying to upgrade Nginx from 1.16.1 to 1.17.10, the
> compilat
Hi
I'm using Nginx on a Gentoo Linux box to serve Ruby apps with Passenger for
years now and up to this point, never any real trouble compiling Nginx.
Today, however, trying to upgrade Nginx from 1.16.1 to 1.17.10, the
compilation hangs early when adding the Passenger module. The version of
Passe
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:22:21PM +0800, 2535191782 wrote:
Hi there,
> In nginx.conf:http{
>
>
> }
> http{
>
>
> }
> can be allowed?
It seems fairly easy to check.
$ sbin/nginx -t
nginx: [emerg] "http" directive is duplicate in
/usr/local/nginx/conf/nginx.conf:8
nginx: configuration file
In nginx.conf:http{
}
http{
}
can be allowed?___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Nginx handles symlinks 100x better than Apache regardless of settings.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,287089,287091#msg-287091
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
* LilFag:
> I'm using Windows and I want Nginx to support these methods in their
> WebDAV.
Free software meets entitlement issues. What's the magic word?
-Ralph
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Same request: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,227415,227487#msg-227487
I'm using Windows and I want Nginx to support these methods in their WebDAV.
There are two things that Nginx and Windows support together so I won't
change to Linux and I cannot compile Roman's ext-dav-mod
Test
From: nginx On Behalf Of Mathew Heard
Sent: 2020年1月10日星期五 上午10:30
To: nginx@nginx.org
Subject: Fwd: Google QUIC support in nginx
Hey nginx team,
How does the roadmap now look given the Cloudflare Quiche "experiment" release?
Is QUIC/HTTP3 still scheduled for mainline?
On F
Hey nginx team,
How does the roadmap now look given the Cloudflare Quiche "experiment"
release? Is QUIC/HTTP3 still scheduled for mainline?
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 16:54, George wrote:
> Roadmap suggests it is in Nginx 1.17 mainline QUIC = HTTP/3
> https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/roadmap :)
>
> Pos
Is there support for forwarding to backends when clients are sending ALPN? I
would like to use the stream module if possible. The following nginx config
works successfully with a Go client but not with the Ruby client. This is
similar to the problem with AWS ELB
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues
Njs js_content can only call js function for now.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,285909,285909#msg-285909
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
I’m using it for termination.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278434,285603#msg-285603
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
onality are you using? Do you terminate DTLS or proxy
it ? For the latter, you don't need patches, as recent nginx version
support UDP "sessions".
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
I have been using it for more than a year now for more than 500 IoT devices
with a cellular connection that connect on average about 4 times per day. My
experience has been very positive: easy to set up and no issues at all (both
for the 1.13.0 and the 1.13.9 patch).
As NGINX is at 1.17 already, I
Hello,
09.07.2019 13:35, Konstantin Pavlov wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on the openssl version change in 18.04 - it
> definitely is on our roadmap to provide prebuilt packages based on
> openssl 1.1.1!
>
> Indeed, new packages built with openssl 1.1.1 will not work on the older
> Ubuntu 18.04
Thanks for this reply, Vladimir! Where can I find nginx' use of openssl
explained in the nginx documentation? I searched but didn't find it.
Also, kirti mentioned re-compiling nginx to achieve a FIPS-compliant
environment; is that necessary?
Thanks!
tl
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx
/n/nginx/nginx_1.17.1-1~bionic_amd64.deb
> and it doesn't have TLS 1.3 support.
> According to
> https://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2019-January/057402.html this
> would be because it was built on an Ubuntu 18.04 "bionic" that was not
> fully updated.
> Ubuntu 18.
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:09:47AM -0400, kirti maindargikar wrote:
> Hi, We are using 1.10.3 nginx in FIPS mode. As discussed above we already
> have FIPS enabled on RHEL and we have recompiled nginx with OpenSSL FIPS.
> However we still see that Nginx is using MD5 algorithms ( which is
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
