Thank you, that makes sense and a bit of testing reveals that is correct.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:38:10PM +1000, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network
> reload
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:38:10PM +1000, SplitIce wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network reloaded
> / tested configuration extremely slowly.
>
> We have found that server_names scales very poorly, once a certain point is
> reached (approx
Hi all,
I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network reloaded
/ tested configuration extremely slowly.
We have found that server_names scales very poorly, once a certain point is
reached (approx 5.5k entries globally, 5k entries for a single host)
performance drops from a <0
