Thank you Igor. I was just basically looking into this:
http://php-fpm.org/wiki/Features#Accelerated_upload_support so im not quite
sure if i am missing something out as it has the same results enabled or
disabled. I will start testing it with multiple clients and see if any
difference. Thanks agai
H
i,
I would really wonder if you would see a real difference between using a
tmpfs or not for the webserver's tmp body location. A tmpfs is only faster,
but as long as your storage has enough free IO resources and is fast enough
to actual write the data, you shouldn't notice.
And keep in mind: Yo
oooppp sorry found the cause "client_body_in_file_only on" changed it to
clean and it's doing it's job.
but am i missing something on PHP side or config side as it seems i am
getting the same response time using php-fpm without the accelerated
support settings
and also using php-cgi, response time
Hi All,
I am trying to test accelerated upload on nginx/php-fpm/php-cgi setup and
comparing different scenarios
e.g one where /temp is a tmpfs, one where it is a disk partition and you
will also notice where in i test using php-cgi. as i need to understand
which can handle file uploads faster.
