Re: client_max_body_size increase

2014-10-14 Thread shm...@riseup.net
mex wrote: > it is more a performance- than a security-issue (diskspace, i/o, buffering) > etc ok assume no webmail activity in this moment does this setting affect & impact a static site serving mainly images in this scenario ? ___ nginx mailing li

Re: client_max_body_size increase

2014-10-14 Thread mex
it is more a performance- than a security-issue (diskspace, i/o, buffering) etc Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,253959,253960#msg-253960 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

client_max_body_size increase

2014-10-14 Thread shm...@riseup.net
are there any inherent security risks associated with increasing to a value of, say, 10M to accommodate attachment upload for web mail client usage ? ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx