Thanks Jonathan!
However, not much details on why it is a 'hack' not to be trusted since
unreliable.
I do not rely on the Wiki anymore, and since Maxim specifically says it
should be removed... I hope it will be, to prevent unreliable
configurations to be shared and propagated based on unofficial
On 2 April 2014 14:13, B.R. wrote:
> If someone had details about reasons not to use post_action (either from the
> referenced IIRC discussion or from other sources), I would be very
> interested in them.
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,213627,213722#msg-213722 and the
note on the wiki next to
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jonathan Matthews
wrote:
> As an aside, IIRC people @nginx have stated publicly that post_action is a
> hack, and that its behaviour should not be relied on. I'm without Internets
> right now so can't find you the quote, but it was sufficient to put me off
> using
On 2 Apr 2014 07:31, "Cristian Rusu" wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I have a setup on nginx to count downloads.
>
>
> location / {.
> post_action /afterdownload;
>
> Here I have a value in $arg_key
>
> location /afterdownload {
>
> I need $arg_key here
>
> Any way to send it to /afterdownload se
Hello
I have a setup on nginx to count downloads.
*location / {.post_action /afterdownload;*
Here I have a value in $arg_key
*location /afterdownload {*
I need $arg_key here
Any way to send it to /afterdownload section?
Thank you
---
